Commentary: When will the robots come marching in?

Evan P. Rotar; Irving L. Kron

doi:10.1111/jocs.15715

Commentary: When will the robots come marching in?

Evan P. Rotar, Irving L. Kron

Medicine Administration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

Minimally invasive techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), specifically robotic-assisted CABG has increased in popularity despite conflicting evidence. Here, we review a report by Yokoyama and colleagues to the Journal of Cardiac Surgery investigating outcomes of robotic versus nonrobotic CABG utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	3193-3194
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Volume	36
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.15715
State	Published - Sep 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1111/jocs.15715

Cite this

@article{890fd7b9c3a34a23a911f5f68e519950,

title = "Commentary: When will the robots come marching in?",

abstract = "Minimally invasive techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), specifically robotic-assisted CABG has increased in popularity despite conflicting evidence. Here, we review a report by Yokoyama and colleagues to the Journal of Cardiac Surgery investigating outcomes of robotic versus nonrobotic CABG utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).",

author = "Rotar, \{Evan P.\} and Kron, \{Irving L.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1111/jocs.15715",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "36",

pages = "3193--3194",

journal = "Journal of Cardiac Surgery",

issn = "0886-0440",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary

T2 - When will the robots come marching in?

AU - Rotar, Evan P.

AU - Kron, Irving L.

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Minimally invasive techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), specifically robotic-assisted CABG has increased in popularity despite conflicting evidence. Here, we review a report by Yokoyama and colleagues to the Journal of Cardiac Surgery investigating outcomes of robotic versus nonrobotic CABG utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).

AB - Minimally invasive techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), specifically robotic-assisted CABG has increased in popularity despite conflicting evidence. Here, we review a report by Yokoyama and colleagues to the Journal of Cardiac Surgery investigating outcomes of robotic versus nonrobotic CABG utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107208995

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107208995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocs.15715

DO - 10.1111/jocs.15715

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 34091945

AN - SCOPUS:85107208995

SN - 0886-0440

VL - 36

SP - 3193

EP - 3194

JO - Journal of Cardiac Surgery

JF - Journal of Cardiac Surgery

IS - 9

ER -

Commentary: When will the robots come marching in?

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this