Abstract
Minimally invasive techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), specifically robotic-assisted CABG has increased in popularity despite conflicting evidence. Here, we review a report by Yokoyama and colleagues to the Journal of Cardiac Surgery investigating outcomes of robotic versus nonrobotic CABG utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3193-3194 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Journal of Cardiac Surgery |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Sep 2021 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine