Abstract
In J.D. Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics textbook, the analysis of Dirac's charge quantization condition in the presence of a magnetic monopole has a mathematical omission and an all-too-brief physical argument that might mislead some students. This paper presents a detailed derivation of Jackson's main result, explains the significance of the missing term, and highlights the close connection between Jackson's findings and Dirac's original argument.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2874-2880 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Scientia Iranica |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Dirac monopole
- Electric charge quantization
- Magnetic monopole
- Vector potential vorticity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Engineering