Collective Pulsing in Xeniid Corals: Part II—Using Computational Fluid Dynamics to Determine if There are Benefits to Coordinated Pulsing

Julia E. Samson, Laura A. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Coordinated movements have been shown to enhance the speed or efficiency of swimming, flying, and pumping in many organisms. Coordinated pulsing has not been observed in many cnidarians (jellyfish, anemones, corals), as is the case for the xeniid corals considered in our corresponding paper. This observation opens the question as to whether xeniid corals, and cnidarians in general, do not coordinate their pulsing behavior for lack of a hydrodynamic advantage or for other reasons. For example, a diffuse nervous system with lack of substantial sensory input may not be capable of such coordination. Similarly, grouping may serve a defensive role rather than a fluid dynamic role. In this paper, the immersed boundary method is used to quantify the volumetric flux of fluid generated by an individual xeniid coral polyp in comparison with a pair of polyps. Both the distances between the polyps and the phase difference between each polyp are considered. More specifically, the fully coupled fluid-structure interaction problem of a coral polyp driving fluid flow is solved using a hybrid version of the immersed boundary method where the Navier–Stokes equations are solved using a finite differences and the elasticity equations describing the coral are solved using finite elements. We explore three possible hypotheses: (1) pulsing in pairs increases upward flow above the polyps and is thus beneficial, (2) these benefits vary with the polyps’ pulsing phase difference, and (3) these benefits vary with the distance between the polyps. We find that there is no substantial hydrodynamic advantage to pulsing in a pair for any phase difference. The volumetric flux of fluid generated by each coral also decreases as the distance between polyps is decreased. This surprising result is consistent with measurements taken from another cnidarian with similar behavior, the upside down jellyfish, in which each medusa drives less flow when in a group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number67
JournalBulletin of Mathematical Biology
Volume82
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biological fluid dynamics
  • Collective behavior
  • Coral
  • Fluid dynamics
  • Immersed boundary method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Immunology
  • Mathematics(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Pharmacology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collective Pulsing in Xeniid Corals: Part II—Using Computational Fluid Dynamics to Determine if There are Benefits to Coordinated Pulsing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this