Abstract
This chapter challenges the so-called semantic assumption - according to which beliefs are necessarily descriptive in that they purport to represent or describe some state of affairs - by arguing that moral judgments share enough of the phenomenological and functional features that are central to the notion of belief, to count as genuine beliefs; a notion that does not require beliefs to be primarily descriptive. This opens the door to a cognitivist version of expressivism. The chapter sketches a version of cognitivist expressivism, including an account of logical embedding (meant to deal with the Frege- Geach problem), which it argued as prima facie more plausible than non-cognitivist and descriptivist alternatives in metaethics.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Metaethics after Moore |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191710032 |
ISBN (Print) | 0199269912, 9780199269914 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 26 2006 |
Keywords
- Cognitivist expressivism
- Descriptive beliefs
- Descriptivism
- Frege-geach problem
- Logical embedding
- Noncognitivism
- Phenomenology
- Semantic assumption
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities