TY - JOUR
T1 - Cloud-resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case
T2 - Part I—Convective updrafts
AU - Fan, Jiwen
AU - Han, Bin
AU - Varble, Adam
AU - Morrison, Hugh
AU - North, Kirk
AU - Kollias, Pavlos
AU - Chen, Baojun
AU - Dong, Xiquan
AU - Giangrande, Scott E.
AU - Khain, Alexander
AU - Lin, Yun
AU - Mansell, Edward
AU - Milbrandt, Jason A.
AU - Stenz, Ronald
AU - Thompson, Gregory
AU - Wang, Yuan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Published 2017.
PY - 2017/9/16
Y1 - 2017/9/16
N2 - An intercomparison study of a midlatitude mesoscale squall line is performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at 1 km horizontal grid spacing with eight different cloud microphysics schemes to investigate processes that contribute to the large variability in simulated cloud and precipitation properties. All simulations tend to produce a wider area of high radar reflectivity (Ze > 45 dBZ) than observed but a much narrower stratiform area. The magnitude of the virtual potential temperature drop associated with the gust front passage is similar in simulations and observations, while the pressure rise and peak wind speed are smaller than observed, possibly suggesting that simulated cold pools are shallower than observed. Most of the microphysics schemes overestimate vertical velocity and Ze in convective updrafts as compared with observational retrievals. Simulated precipitation rates and updraft velocities have significant variability across the eight schemes, even in this strongly dynamically driven system. Differences in simulated updraft velocity correlate well with differences in simulated buoyancy and low-level vertical perturbation pressure gradient, which appears related to cold pool intensity that is controlled by the evaporation rate. Simulations with stronger updrafts have a more optimal convective state, with stronger cold pools, ambient low-level vertical wind shear, and rear-inflow jets. Updraft velocity variability between schemes is mainly controlled by differences in simulated ice-related processes, which impact the overall latent heating rate, whereas surface rainfall variability increases in no-ice simulations mainly because of scheme differences in collision-coalescence parameterizations.
AB - An intercomparison study of a midlatitude mesoscale squall line is performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at 1 km horizontal grid spacing with eight different cloud microphysics schemes to investigate processes that contribute to the large variability in simulated cloud and precipitation properties. All simulations tend to produce a wider area of high radar reflectivity (Ze > 45 dBZ) than observed but a much narrower stratiform area. The magnitude of the virtual potential temperature drop associated with the gust front passage is similar in simulations and observations, while the pressure rise and peak wind speed are smaller than observed, possibly suggesting that simulated cold pools are shallower than observed. Most of the microphysics schemes overestimate vertical velocity and Ze in convective updrafts as compared with observational retrievals. Simulated precipitation rates and updraft velocities have significant variability across the eight schemes, even in this strongly dynamically driven system. Differences in simulated updraft velocity correlate well with differences in simulated buoyancy and low-level vertical perturbation pressure gradient, which appears related to cold pool intensity that is controlled by the evaporation rate. Simulations with stronger updrafts have a more optimal convective state, with stronger cold pools, ambient low-level vertical wind shear, and rear-inflow jets. Updraft velocity variability between schemes is mainly controlled by differences in simulated ice-related processes, which impact the overall latent heating rate, whereas surface rainfall variability increases in no-ice simulations mainly because of scheme differences in collision-coalescence parameterizations.
KW - convection
KW - microphysics parameterization
KW - model intercomparison
KW - squall line
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030116117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030116117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2017JD026622
DO - 10.1002/2017JD026622
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85030116117
SN - 2169-897X
VL - 122
SP - 9351
EP - 9378
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
IS - 17
ER -