Clinical Implications of Low Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count in the SPIROMICS COPD Cohort

  • W. Blake LeMaster
  • , P. Miguel Quibrera
  • , David Couper
  • , Donald P. Tashkin
  • , Eugene R. Bleecker
  • , Claire M. Doerschuk
  • , Victor E. Ortega
  • , Christopher Cooper
  • , Mei Lan K. Han
  • , Prescott G. Woodruff
  • , Wanda K. O'Neal
  • , Wayne H. Anderson
  • , Neil E. Alexis
  • , Russell P. Bowler
  • , R. Graham Barr
  • , Robert J. Kaner
  • , Mark T. Dransfield
  • , Robert Paine
  • , Victor Kim
  • , Jeffrey L. Curtis
  • Fernando J. Martinez, Annette T. Hastie, Igor Barjaktarevic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) considers blood eosinophil counts < 100 cells/μL (BEC≤100) in people with COPD to predict poor inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) responsiveness. However, the BEC≤100 phenotype is inadequately characterized, especially in advanced COPD. Research Question: Are there differences between GOLD group D patients with high BEC and those with low BEC regarding baseline characteristics and longitudinal outcomes? Study Design and Methods: We used multivariable mixed models and logistic regression to contrast clinical characteristics and outcomes of BEC≤100 vs BEC > 100 (BEC100+) in all subjects with COPD (n = 1,414) and GOLD group D subjects (n = 185) not receiving ICS. Results: We identified n = 485 with BEC≤100 (n = 61 GOLD group D) and n = 929 people with BEC100+ (n = 124 GOLD group D). BEC≤100 status was stable at 6 weeks and approximately 52 weeks (intraclass correlations of 0.78 and 0.71, respectively). Compared with BEC100+, BEC≤100 comprised more women, with greater current smoking, and less frequent childhood asthma. Among all analyzed participants, the two BEC-defined subsets showed similar rates of lung function decline (mean slope, BEC≤100 vs BEC100+, –50 vs –39 mL/y; P = .140), exacerbations (0.40 vs 0.36/y; P = .098), subsequent ICS initiation (2.5% vs 4.4%; P = .071), and mortality (7.8% vs 8.4%; P = .715). However, in GOLD group D, people with BEC≤100 showed higher exacerbation rates within 365 days of enrollment (0.62 vs 0.33/y; P = .002) and total follow-up (1.16 vs 0.83/y; P = .014). They also had greater lung function decline (mean slope of –68 mL/y vs –23 mL/y; P = .036) and had greater emphysema at baseline (voxels < 950 Hounsfield units at total lung capacity of 7.46% vs 4.61%; P = .029). Interpretation: In non-ICS-treated GOLD group D COPD, people with BEC≤100 had more baseline emphysema, prospective exacerbations, and lung function decline. Our analysis has identified a particularly vulnerable subpopulation of people with COPD, suggesting the need for studies focused specifically on their therapeutic treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01969344; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)515-528
Number of pages14
JournalCHEST
Volume163
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • COPD
  • GOLD group D
  • eosinophil
  • inhaled corticosteroid

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Implications of Low Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count in the SPIROMICS COPD Cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this