@article{d376a73782924f588a797b8d7a2a61d7,
title = "Climate sensitivity of understory trees differs from overstory trees in temperate mesic forests",
abstract = "The response of understory trees to climate variability is key to understanding current and future forest dynamics. However, analyses of climatic effects on tree growth have primarily focused on the upper canopy, leaving understory dynamics unresolved. We analyzed differences in climate sensitivity based on canopy position of four common tree species (Acer rubrum, Fagus grandifolia, Quercus rubra, and Tsuga canadensis) using growth information from 1,084 trees across eight sites in the northeastern United States. Effects of canopy position on climate response varied, but were significant and often nonlinear, for all four species. Compared to overstory trees, understory trees showed stronger reductions in growth at high temperatures and varied shifts in precipitation response. This contradicts the prevailing assumption that climate responses, particularly to temperature, of understory trees are buffered by the overstory. Forest growth trajectories are uncertain in compositionally and structurally complex forests, and future demography and regeneration dynamics may be misinferred if not all canopy levels are represented in future forecasts.",
keywords = "canopy position, climate–growth relationship, forest structure, generalized additive models, tree rings",
author = "Rollinson, {Christine R.} and Alexander, {M. Ross} and Dye, {Alex W.} and Moore, {David J.P.} and Neil Pederson and Valerie Trouet",
note = "Funding Information: This research was supported by the DOE Regional and Global Climate Modeling program DE577SC0016011 (Moore and Trouet) and Macrosystems National Science Foundation EF‐1241930, which supports the PalEON Project (N. Pederson; paleonproject.org). Thank you to Daniel A. Bishop for processing and cross dating samples that make up a significant portion of these data, and to Dario Martin‐Benito for his rigorous and helpful comments during early stages of the manuscript. Author contributions are as follows: M. R. Alexander, C. R. Rollinson, and V. Trouet conceived the main analyses. M. R. Alexander, N. Pederson, and A. W. Dye conducted the field sampling and dendrochronological analyses of tree‐core samples. C. R. Rollinson, M. R. Alexander, and N. Pederson contributed to the analyses and code generation. M. R. Alexander and C. R. Rollinson wrote the manuscript with input from all authors regarding intellectual project development and manuscript revisions. Funding Information: This research was supported by the DOE Regional and Global Climate Modeling program DE577SC0016011 (Moore and Trouet) and Macrosystems National Science Foundation EF-1241930, which supports the PalEON Project (N. Pederson; paleonproject.org). Thank you to Daniel A. Bishop for processing and cross dating samples that make up a significant portion of these data, and to Dario Martin-Benito for his rigorous and helpful comments during early stages of the manuscript. Author contributions are as follows: M. R. Alexander, C. R. Rollinson, and V. Trouet conceived the main analyses. M. R. Alexander, N. Pederson, and A. W. Dye conducted the field sampling and dendrochronological analyses of tree-core samples. C. R. Rollinson, M. R. Alexander, and N. Pederson contributed to the analyses and code generation. M. R. Alexander and C. R. Rollinson wrote the manuscript with input from all authors regarding intellectual project development and manuscript revisions. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 by the Ecological Society of America",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1002/ecy.3264",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
journal = "Ecology",
issn = "0012-9658",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "3",
}