TY - JOUR
T1 - Clarifying the Function of Mortality Salience-Induced Worldview Defense
T2 - Renewed Suppression or Reduced Accessibility of Death-Related Thoughts?
AU - Greenberg, Jeff
AU - Arndt, Jamie
AU - Schimel, Jeff
AU - Pyszczynski, Tom
AU - Solomon, Sheldon
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grants SBR-9212798, SBR-9312546, and SBR-9601474.
PY - 2001/1
Y1 - 2001/1
N2 - Previous terror management research has shown that following mortality salience, there is an effortful suppression of death-related thoughts, reducing death-thought accessibility. This is followed, after a delay, by an increase in death thought accessibility, which instigates defense of the cultural worldview; that defense, in turn, reduces accessibility of death-related thoughts. Prior research has not shown, however, whether this postworldview defense reduction in death thought accessibility is due to an actual dissipation or to renewed efforts at suppressing such cognitions. The present study assessed these two possibilities by manipulating whether participants contemplated their mortality, had the opportunity for worldview defense, and were under high or low cognitive load. Results supported the dissipation explanation by showing that high cognitive load had no effect on levels of death thought accessibility after participants defended their worldview in response to mortality salience.
AB - Previous terror management research has shown that following mortality salience, there is an effortful suppression of death-related thoughts, reducing death-thought accessibility. This is followed, after a delay, by an increase in death thought accessibility, which instigates defense of the cultural worldview; that defense, in turn, reduces accessibility of death-related thoughts. Prior research has not shown, however, whether this postworldview defense reduction in death thought accessibility is due to an actual dissipation or to renewed efforts at suppressing such cognitions. The present study assessed these two possibilities by manipulating whether participants contemplated their mortality, had the opportunity for worldview defense, and were under high or low cognitive load. Results supported the dissipation explanation by showing that high cognitive load had no effect on levels of death thought accessibility after participants defended their worldview in response to mortality salience.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035579341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035579341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jesp.2000.1434
DO - 10.1006/jesp.2000.1434
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035579341
SN - 0022-1031
VL - 37
SP - 70
EP - 76
JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
IS - 1
ER -