TY - JOUR
T1 - Circulating endothelial signatures correlate with worse outcomes in COVID-19, respiratory failure and ARDS
AU - IMPACC Network
AU - CAFPINT Site investigators of the PALISI Network
AU - Costa Monteiro, Ana C.
AU - Pickering, Harry
AU - Sarma, Aartik
AU - Taylor, Clove S.
AU - Jenkins, Meagan M.
AU - Hsu, Fei Man
AU - Nadel, Brian
AU - Levy, Ofer
AU - Baden, Lindsey R.
AU - Melamed, Esther
AU - Ehrlich, Lauren I.R.
AU - McComsey, Grace A.
AU - Sekaly, Rafick P.
AU - Cairns, Charles B.
AU - Haddad, Elias K.
AU - Shaw, Albert C.
AU - Hafler, David A.
AU - Montgomery, Ruth R.
AU - Corry, David B.
AU - Kheradmand, Farrah
AU - Atkinson, Mark A.
AU - Brakenridge, Scott C.
AU - Higuita, Nelson I.Agudelo
AU - Metcalf, Jordan P.
AU - Hough, Catherine L.
AU - Messer, William B.
AU - Pulendran, Bali
AU - Nadeau, Kari C.
AU - Davis, Mark M.
AU - Geng, Linda N.
AU - Fernandez-Sesma, Ana
AU - Simon, Viviana
AU - Krammer, Florian
AU - Kraft, Monica
AU - Bime, Chris
AU - Calfee, Carolyn S.
AU - Erle, David J.
AU - Bosinger, Steve
AU - Eckalbar, Walter
AU - Maecker, Holden
AU - Rahman, Adeeb
AU - Guan, Leying
AU - Peters, Bjoern
AU - Kleinstein, Steven H.
AU - Augustine, Alison D.
AU - Diray-Arce, Joann
AU - Becker, Patrice M.
AU - Rouphael, Nadine
AU - Kimura, Hiroki
AU - Mosier, Jarrod
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: Elevated circulating endothelial cells (CECs), released from monolayers after insult, have been implicated in worse outcomes in ARDS and COVID-19, however there is no consensus proteomic phenotype that define CECs. We queried whether a transcriptomic approach would alternatively support the presence of endothelial cells in circulation and correlate with worsening respiratory failure. Methods: To test whether elevated endothelial cell signatures (ECS) in circulation plays a role in worse respiratory outcomes, we used unsupervised bulk-transcriptome deconvolution to quantify ECS% in two cohorts. Our pilot analysis included pediatric patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (CAF-PINT, NCT01892969). Our validation cohort included adult hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (IMPACC, NCT04378777), testing the association of ECS% to outcomes in patients at risk of acute respiratory failure/ARDS. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: In CAF-PINT, day 0 ECS% was higher in non-survivors compared to survivors of respiratory failure (2.8%, IQR 2.4–3.4% versus 2.6%, IQR 2.2–3.0% n = 244, p < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum). In IMPACC, baseline ECS% (< 72 h of hospitalization) was higher in COVID-19 non-survivors versus survivors (2.9%, IQR 2.6–3.4%, versus 2.7%, IQR 2.3–3.1%, n = 932, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum). Each 1% increase in baseline ECS% was significantly associated with mortality (adjusted OR 1.36, CI 1.03–1.79) by multivariable logistic regression. Increased baseline ECS% was associated with worse respiratory trajectories (2.5%, IQR 2.2–2.8% for trajectory with no oxygen requirements, 2.9%, IQR 2.6–3.4% for the trajectory with fatal outcome by day 28, n = 932, p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA). Conclusion: Quantifying ECS by deconvolution supports a transcriptomics-driven approach towards the non-invasive evaluation of endothelial damage in respiratory outcomes. This is a first step towards elucidating mechanistic components linking endothelial damage to ARDS utilizing non-invasive, circulating transcriptomic data by leveraging a novel deconvolution approach.
AB - Background: Elevated circulating endothelial cells (CECs), released from monolayers after insult, have been implicated in worse outcomes in ARDS and COVID-19, however there is no consensus proteomic phenotype that define CECs. We queried whether a transcriptomic approach would alternatively support the presence of endothelial cells in circulation and correlate with worsening respiratory failure. Methods: To test whether elevated endothelial cell signatures (ECS) in circulation plays a role in worse respiratory outcomes, we used unsupervised bulk-transcriptome deconvolution to quantify ECS% in two cohorts. Our pilot analysis included pediatric patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (CAF-PINT, NCT01892969). Our validation cohort included adult hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (IMPACC, NCT04378777), testing the association of ECS% to outcomes in patients at risk of acute respiratory failure/ARDS. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: In CAF-PINT, day 0 ECS% was higher in non-survivors compared to survivors of respiratory failure (2.8%, IQR 2.4–3.4% versus 2.6%, IQR 2.2–3.0% n = 244, p < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum). In IMPACC, baseline ECS% (< 72 h of hospitalization) was higher in COVID-19 non-survivors versus survivors (2.9%, IQR 2.6–3.4%, versus 2.7%, IQR 2.3–3.1%, n = 932, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum). Each 1% increase in baseline ECS% was significantly associated with mortality (adjusted OR 1.36, CI 1.03–1.79) by multivariable logistic regression. Increased baseline ECS% was associated with worse respiratory trajectories (2.5%, IQR 2.2–2.8% for trajectory with no oxygen requirements, 2.9%, IQR 2.6–3.4% for the trajectory with fatal outcome by day 28, n = 932, p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA). Conclusion: Quantifying ECS by deconvolution supports a transcriptomics-driven approach towards the non-invasive evaluation of endothelial damage in respiratory outcomes. This is a first step towards elucidating mechanistic components linking endothelial damage to ARDS utilizing non-invasive, circulating transcriptomic data by leveraging a novel deconvolution approach.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018660060
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018660060#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1186/s13054-025-05596-0
DO - 10.1186/s13054-025-05596-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 41088445
AN - SCOPUS:105018660060
SN - 1364-8535
VL - 29
JO - Critical Care
JF - Critical Care
IS - 1
M1 - 432
ER -