TY - JOUR
T1 - Children's mechanistic reasoning
AU - Bolger, Molly S.
AU - Kobiela, Marta
AU - Weinberg, Paul J.
AU - Lehrer, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number 0733209. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - Reasoning about mechanisms is one of the hallmarks of disciplined inquiry in science and engineering, but comparatively little is known about its precursors and development. Children at grades 2 and 5 predicted and explained the motion of simple mechanical systems composed entirely of visible linkages (levers). Students' explanations of device behavior suggested four forms of knowledge: simple recognition of device components, noting of structural relations among components, construction of cause-effect rules derived by observation of regularities in device behavior, and identification of essential system components and interactions among components that accounted for cause-effect rules. Only a few children coordinated multiple essential components to constitute a mechanistic causal scheme. Mechanistic causal schemes, in turn, were associated with successful prediction of the output motion of a system. Device tracing via gesture and talk appeared to support this form of knowledge development, and hence may inform future instructional design.
AB - Reasoning about mechanisms is one of the hallmarks of disciplined inquiry in science and engineering, but comparatively little is known about its precursors and development. Children at grades 2 and 5 predicted and explained the motion of simple mechanical systems composed entirely of visible linkages (levers). Students' explanations of device behavior suggested four forms of knowledge: simple recognition of device components, noting of structural relations among components, construction of cause-effect rules derived by observation of regularities in device behavior, and identification of essential system components and interactions among components that accounted for cause-effect rules. Only a few children coordinated multiple essential components to constitute a mechanistic causal scheme. Mechanistic causal schemes, in turn, were associated with successful prediction of the output motion of a system. Device tracing via gesture and talk appeared to support this form of knowledge development, and hence may inform future instructional design.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859633315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859633315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07370008.2012.661815
DO - 10.1080/07370008.2012.661815
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84859633315
SN - 0737-0008
VL - 30
SP - 170
EP - 206
JO - Cognition and Instruction
JF - Cognition and Instruction
IS - 2
ER -