TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of Ventricular Tachycardia After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy
T2 - A Single-Center Ablation Experience
AU - Moss, Joshua D.
AU - Flatley, Erin E.
AU - Beaser, Andrew D.
AU - Shin, John H.
AU - Nayak, Hemal M.
AU - Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
AU - Burke, Martin C.
AU - Jeevanandam, Valluvan
AU - Uriel, Nir
AU - Tung, Roderick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2017/12/11
Y1 - 2017/12/11
N2 - Objectives This study sought to report mechanisms of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and outcomes of VT ablation in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy. Background Continuous flow LVAD implantation plays a growing role in the management of end-stage heart failure, and VT is common. There are limited reports of VT ablation in patients with a destination LVAD. Methods Patients with a continuous-flow LVAD referred for VT ablation from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural data, and clinical follow-up were evaluated. Arrhythmia-free survival was assessed. Results Twenty-one patients (90% male, 62 ± 10 years) underwent catheter ablation of VT at a median of 191 days (interquartile range: 55 to 403 days) after LVAD implantation (15 HeartMate II, 6 HeartWare HVAD). Five patients (24%) had termination (n = 4) or slowing (n = 1) of VT with ablation near the apical inflow cannula, and 3 (14%) had bundle-branch re-entry. Freedom from recurrent VT among surviving patients was 64% at 1 year, with overall survival 67% at 1 year for patients without arrhythmia recurrence and 29% for patients with recurrence (p = 0.049). One patient had suspected pump thrombosis within 30 days of the ablation procedure, with no other major acute complications. Conclusions In this relatively large, single-center experience of VT ablation in destination LVAD, freedom from recurrent VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks was associated with improved 1-year survival. Bundle branch re-entry was more prevalent than anticipated, and cannula-adjacent VT was less common. This challenging population remains at risk for late pump thrombosis and mortality.
AB - Objectives This study sought to report mechanisms of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and outcomes of VT ablation in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy. Background Continuous flow LVAD implantation plays a growing role in the management of end-stage heart failure, and VT is common. There are limited reports of VT ablation in patients with a destination LVAD. Methods Patients with a continuous-flow LVAD referred for VT ablation from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural data, and clinical follow-up were evaluated. Arrhythmia-free survival was assessed. Results Twenty-one patients (90% male, 62 ± 10 years) underwent catheter ablation of VT at a median of 191 days (interquartile range: 55 to 403 days) after LVAD implantation (15 HeartMate II, 6 HeartWare HVAD). Five patients (24%) had termination (n = 4) or slowing (n = 1) of VT with ablation near the apical inflow cannula, and 3 (14%) had bundle-branch re-entry. Freedom from recurrent VT among surviving patients was 64% at 1 year, with overall survival 67% at 1 year for patients without arrhythmia recurrence and 29% for patients with recurrence (p = 0.049). One patient had suspected pump thrombosis within 30 days of the ablation procedure, with no other major acute complications. Conclusions In this relatively large, single-center experience of VT ablation in destination LVAD, freedom from recurrent VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks was associated with improved 1-year survival. Bundle branch re-entry was more prevalent than anticipated, and cannula-adjacent VT was less common. This challenging population remains at risk for late pump thrombosis and mortality.
KW - ablation
KW - left ventricular assist device
KW - ventricular tachycardia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026678537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026678537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 29759673
AN - SCOPUS:85026678537
SN - 2405-500X
VL - 3
SP - 1412
EP - 1424
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 12
ER -