Characterization of the immune response in patients with cancer of the oral cavity after neoadjuvant immunotherapy with the IRX-2 regimen

the INSPIRE Trial Clinical Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: IRX-2 is a homologous cell-derived multi-cytokine biologic with multifaceted immune modulatory effects that has been shown to induce increased lymphocyte infiltration into primary tumors in oral cavity carcinoma. Our objective was to characterize tumor immune gene expression and epigenomic changes after neoadjuvant IRX-2 immunotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Methods: A randomized phase II trial was conducted of the IRX regimen 3 weeks prior to surgery for previously untreated patients with Stage II-IV oral cavity carcinoma. The treatment regimen consisted of low dose (300 mg/m2) cyclophosphamide (day 1) followed by 10 days of regional perilymphatic IRX-2 cytokine injections and daily oral indomethacin, zinc and omeprazole (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without the IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2). The NanoString immune panel (730 genes) and Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip were performed to assess the gene expression and DNA methylation signatures, respectively, in pre- and post-immunotherapy tumor samples. Results: A total of 51 and 79 immune-related genes were found upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in the samples from Regimen 1 patients after treatment, while 51 and 56 were found upregulated and downregulated in the samples for Regimen 2. When comparing the changes between the two regimens, we identified 9 genes significantly different, including DMBT1, a potential tumor suppressor, functioning in tumor invasion of head and neck cancer. The exploration of DNA methylation showed slight overall hypermethylation after treatment in both regimens, especially for Regimen 1 immune responders, and methylation-based cell type deconvolution demonstrated high concordance with tumor infiltrating T lymphocyte cell counts. Conclusion: While a consistent patient response after treatment was observed, most changes were similar between regimens, indicating a subtle, targeted, or patient-specific effect of IRX-2 cytokines. Change in DMBT1 expression was a unique finding that will require further study to better understand its significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105587
JournalOral Oncology
Volume123
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Cytokine
  • Immunotherapy
  • NanoString
  • Neoadjuvant
  • Oral cavity carcinoma
  • Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characterization of the immune response in patients with cancer of the oral cavity after neoadjuvant immunotherapy with the IRX-2 regimen'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this