Abstract
Using hand-collected data on CEO noncompete agreements (NCAs), we find that NCAs are less common when CEOs expect to incur greater personal costs from reduced job mobility and more common when firms expect to suffer greater economic harm if departing CEOs leave to work for a competitor. Additionally, turnover-performance sensitivity is stronger when CEOs have NCAs. Finally, total compensation and incentive pay are higher if CEOs have more enforceable NCAs. Our identification strategy exploits staggered state-level changes in NCA enforceability. Overall, our findings suggest that restrictions on job mobility have important implications for how CEOs are monitored and compensated.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 4701-4744 |
Number of pages | 44 |
Journal | Review of Financial Studies |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2021 |
Keywords
- G30
- G32
- G34
- K22
- L22
- L25
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics