Causalism Without Causation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Moore’s Mechanical Choices is ripe with interesting ideas. Here I’ll focus on a particularly intriguing one that intersects with some aspects of my own work. It’s the suggestion that causalism should be amended in a way that doesn’t require causation. At first, this suggestion may sound absurd: How can causalism survive without causation, of all things? But I think that Moore is actually right about the main suggestion. I don’t think he’s right for the right reasons, but he’s still right about the main idea. So, the aim of this paper is to explain how causalism can survive without causation, and how it may not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-199
Number of pages15
JournalCriminal Law and Philosophy
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Agency
  • Causalism
  • Causation
  • Michael Moore
  • Moral responsibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Causalism Without Causation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this