Abstract
Care management program evaluations bring together constituents from finance, medicine, and social sciences. The differing assumptions and scientific philosophies that these constituents bring to the task often lead to frustrations and even contentions. Given the forms and variations of care management programs, the difficultly associated with program outcomes measurement should not be surprising. It is no wonder then that methods for clinical and economic evaluations of program efficacy continue to be debated and have yet to be standardized. We describe these somewhat hidden processes, examine where the industry stands, and provide recommendations for steps to standardize evaluation methodology.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 176-181 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Disease Management |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2006 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy