Abstract
This paper provides empirical evidence that power tariff reform with pro rata pricing and higher unit rates for electricity not only would promote equity, efficiency and sustainability in groundwater use, but also would be socio-economically viable for small-holder farmers. It shows that the arguments of "high transaction cost" and "political infeasibility" used against metering are valid only in specific regional contexts and under increasingly outmoded power-pricing and agricultural-production regimes, if one considers the recent advancements in remote sensing and the facts that overexploited regions have a low density of wells and are mostly owned by farmers who constitute a small segment of the farming community.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 557-573 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | International Journal of Water Resources Development |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- energy rationing
- groundwater-electricity nexus
- prepaid meters
- pro rata pricing
- water productivity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Water Science and Technology