Building a successful community coalition-university partnership at the Arizona-Sonora border.

Anne Hill, Jill Guernsey de Zapien, Rosie Stewart, Evelyn Whitmer, Yolanda Caruso, Lea Dodge, Mary Kirkoff, Emma Melo, Lisa Staten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


PURPOSE: The purpose of the case study is to explore a successful community-university partnership through community-based participatory action and to examine the partnership's ability to make policy changes toward improving health behaviors. BACKGROUND: Diabetes mortality at the U.S.-Mexico Border is twice the national average. Poor health care access is also a concern. These factors prompted Douglas community members to form a community coalition and invite university participation. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW: Douglas coalition members and University of Arizona (UA) partners worked together to improve chronic disease prevention and control in Douglas, Arizona, by engaging programmatic and policy activities and working with the local schools and government. COALITION/PARTNERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS, STRENGTHS, AND WEAKNESSES: Data were collected from multiple sources, including key informant interviews, the Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory, and annual evaluations to document effectiveness, strengths, and weaknesses. CONCLUSION: A successful community coalition-university partnership is the result of long-term collaboration, equal participation, and acknowledgement that policy work takes time. The Douglas partnership, through policy, has effected local health behavior changes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-250
Number of pages6
JournalProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Building a successful community coalition-university partnership at the Arizona-Sonora border.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this