TY - CHAP
T1 - Bringing People Back In
T2 - Crisis Planning and Response Embedded in Social Contexts
AU - Thompson-Dyck, Kendra
AU - Mayer, Brian
AU - Anderson, Kathryn Freeman
AU - Galaskiewicz, Joseph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Urban resilience requires sophisticated technical expertise to anticipate problems and develop transformative solutions, yet these efforts alone are often insufficient. We argue that resilience work needs to acknowledge the social contexts in which these plans are situated to better identify potential pitfalls and negotiate challenges “on the ground.” Drawing on Zukin and DiMaggio’s (Structures of capital: the social organization of the economy. Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp 1–36, 1990) embeddedness framework, we explain how cognitive, cultural, structural, and political contexts can complicate resilience work. First, we describe the framework and draw on extant literature to show how the four dimensions relate to urban resilience. Then, we use case studies from two environmental disasters to illustrate how emergency response efforts fell short because they did not adequately account for social context. Our aim is to orient urban resilience experts and practitioners to embeddedness thinking and offer suggestions for ways to better negotiate obstacles to success and opportunities for improvement inherent in the social environment.
AB - Urban resilience requires sophisticated technical expertise to anticipate problems and develop transformative solutions, yet these efforts alone are often insufficient. We argue that resilience work needs to acknowledge the social contexts in which these plans are situated to better identify potential pitfalls and negotiate challenges “on the ground.” Drawing on Zukin and DiMaggio’s (Structures of capital: the social organization of the economy. Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp 1–36, 1990) embeddedness framework, we explain how cognitive, cultural, structural, and political contexts can complicate resilience work. First, we describe the framework and draw on extant literature to show how the four dimensions relate to urban resilience. Then, we use case studies from two environmental disasters to illustrate how emergency response efforts fell short because they did not adequately account for social context. Our aim is to orient urban resilience experts and practitioners to embeddedness thinking and offer suggestions for ways to better negotiate obstacles to success and opportunities for improvement inherent in the social environment.
KW - Collective Efficacy
KW - Disaster Planning
KW - Planning Team
KW - Relational Embeddedness
KW - Relief Worker
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075900494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075900494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_14
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_14
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85075900494
T3 - Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications
SP - 279
EP - 293
BT - Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications
PB - Springer
ER -