TY - JOUR
T1 - Bridging the physician and CAM practitioner communication gap
T2 - Suggested framework for communication between physicians and CAM practitioners based on a cross professional survey from Israel
AU - Schiff, Elad
AU - Frenkel, Moshe
AU - Shilo, Margalit
AU - Levy, Moti
AU - Schachter, Leora
AU - Freifeld, Yuval
AU - Steinfeld, Irena
AU - Maizes, Victoria
AU - Ben-Arye, Eran
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - Objective: Our study aimed to develop a framework to improve communication between physicians and CAM practitioners regarding mutual patients. Methods: Following a modified Delphi process, we developed preliminary recommendations regarding communication between physicians and CAM practitioners. We then surveyed 473 physicians and 781 CAM practitioners regarding their opinions on these recommendations. Results: High reliability and validity of the survey were found among the physicians and CAM practitioners (Cronbach's alpha score of .94 and .83, respectively). Physicians and CAM practitioners considered communication regarding mutual patients important (80% and 97%, respectively; P< .001). A medical/referral letter was the preferred communication mode. Physicians and CAM practitioners concurred on four elements that should be included in such a referral letter: conventional-CAM diagnosis with coherent terminology, possible conventional-CAM treatment interactions, description of the treatment plan and its goals, and quality issues regarding CAM supplements. Conclusions: A practical framework for advancing physician-CAM practitioner communication is feasible, and may be applied in daily medical care with the goal of bridging the patient-physician-CAM practitioner communication gap. Practice implications: Communication between physicians and CAM practitioners regarding mutual patients is important. Establishing a framework for the mode and content of such communication is feasible.
AB - Objective: Our study aimed to develop a framework to improve communication between physicians and CAM practitioners regarding mutual patients. Methods: Following a modified Delphi process, we developed preliminary recommendations regarding communication between physicians and CAM practitioners. We then surveyed 473 physicians and 781 CAM practitioners regarding their opinions on these recommendations. Results: High reliability and validity of the survey were found among the physicians and CAM practitioners (Cronbach's alpha score of .94 and .83, respectively). Physicians and CAM practitioners considered communication regarding mutual patients important (80% and 97%, respectively; P< .001). A medical/referral letter was the preferred communication mode. Physicians and CAM practitioners concurred on four elements that should be included in such a referral letter: conventional-CAM diagnosis with coherent terminology, possible conventional-CAM treatment interactions, description of the treatment plan and its goals, and quality issues regarding CAM supplements. Conclusions: A practical framework for advancing physician-CAM practitioner communication is feasible, and may be applied in daily medical care with the goal of bridging the patient-physician-CAM practitioner communication gap. Practice implications: Communication between physicians and CAM practitioners regarding mutual patients is important. Establishing a framework for the mode and content of such communication is feasible.
KW - Alternative medicine
KW - CAM practitioners
KW - Complementary medicine
KW - Doctor-patient communication
KW - Integrative medicine
KW - Physicians
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053978556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053978556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.029
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 21041056
AN - SCOPUS:80053978556
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 85
SP - 188
EP - 193
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 2
ER -