TY - JOUR
T1 - Blood culture quality improvement
T2 - A College of American Pathologists Q- probes study involving 909 institutions and 289 572 blood culture sets
AU - Schifman, Ron B.
AU - Bachner, Paul
AU - Howanitz, Peter J.
PY - 1996/11
Y1 - 1996/11
N2 - Objective.-To evaluate solitary blood culture (SBC) collections as a preanalytic quality indicator of blood culture practice. Design and Setting.- Two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement studies involving prospective evaluation of the proportion of and reasons for SBC collections in 909 institutions. Outcome.-Reduction in the proportion of SBCs. Results.-Of 289 572 blood culture sets studied, the median proportion of SBCs per institution was 10.1% and 12.1% among adult inpatients, 25.4% and 33.3% among adult outpatients, and 89.0% and 100% among pediatric/infant patients in the first and second (follow-up) studies, respectively. The two most common reasons for not performing a second culture in adults were (1) test not indicated and (2) physician believed one was sufficient. When compared with inpatient cultures, a significantly higher proportion of outpatient SBCs were classified as not indicated (P < .0001). Among 198 institutions participating in both studies, a significant decline in SBC rates was observed in the subgroup (n = 50) that continued to monitor SBCs (P = .004). Conclusions.-Interinstitutional evaluation of solitary blood cultures provides a benchmark for quality assessment and an opportunity for performance improvement in blood culture specimen collections.
AB - Objective.-To evaluate solitary blood culture (SBC) collections as a preanalytic quality indicator of blood culture practice. Design and Setting.- Two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement studies involving prospective evaluation of the proportion of and reasons for SBC collections in 909 institutions. Outcome.-Reduction in the proportion of SBCs. Results.-Of 289 572 blood culture sets studied, the median proportion of SBCs per institution was 10.1% and 12.1% among adult inpatients, 25.4% and 33.3% among adult outpatients, and 89.0% and 100% among pediatric/infant patients in the first and second (follow-up) studies, respectively. The two most common reasons for not performing a second culture in adults were (1) test not indicated and (2) physician believed one was sufficient. When compared with inpatient cultures, a significantly higher proportion of outpatient SBCs were classified as not indicated (P < .0001). Among 198 institutions participating in both studies, a significant decline in SBC rates was observed in the subgroup (n = 50) that continued to monitor SBCs (P = .004). Conclusions.-Interinstitutional evaluation of solitary blood cultures provides a benchmark for quality assessment and an opportunity for performance improvement in blood culture specimen collections.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029832798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029832798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 12049115
AN - SCOPUS:0029832798
SN - 0003-9985
VL - 120
SP - 999
EP - 1002
JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
IS - 11
ER -