TY - JOUR
T1 - Biobanking and public health
T2 - Is a human rights approach the tie that binds?
AU - Meslin, Eric M.
AU - Garba, Ibrahim
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Ethical principles guiding public health and genomic medicine are often at odds: whereas public health practice adopts collectivist principles that emphasize population-based benefits, recent advances in genomic and personalized medicine are grounded in an individualist ethic that privileges informed consent, and the balancing of individual risk and benefit. Indeed, the attraction of personalized medicine is the promise it holds out to help individuals get the "right medicine for the right problem at the right time." Research biobanks are an effective tool in the genomic medicine toolbox. Biobanking in public health presents a unique case study to unpack some of these issues in more detail. For example, there is a long history of using banked tissue obtained under clinical diagnostic conditions for later public health uses. But despite the collectivist approach of public health, the principles applied to the ethical challenges of biobanking (e.g. informed consent, autonomy, privacy) remain individualist. We demonstrate the value of using human rights as a public health ethics framework to address this tension in biobanking by applying it to two illustrative cases.
AB - Ethical principles guiding public health and genomic medicine are often at odds: whereas public health practice adopts collectivist principles that emphasize population-based benefits, recent advances in genomic and personalized medicine are grounded in an individualist ethic that privileges informed consent, and the balancing of individual risk and benefit. Indeed, the attraction of personalized medicine is the promise it holds out to help individuals get the "right medicine for the right problem at the right time." Research biobanks are an effective tool in the genomic medicine toolbox. Biobanking in public health presents a unique case study to unpack some of these issues in more detail. For example, there is a long history of using banked tissue obtained under clinical diagnostic conditions for later public health uses. But despite the collectivist approach of public health, the principles applied to the ethical challenges of biobanking (e.g. informed consent, autonomy, privacy) remain individualist. We demonstrate the value of using human rights as a public health ethics framework to address this tension in biobanking by applying it to two illustrative cases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053300506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053300506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00439-011-1061-2
DO - 10.1007/s00439-011-1061-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 21761137
AN - SCOPUS:80053300506
SN - 0340-6717
VL - 130
SP - 451
EP - 463
JO - Human Genetics
JF - Human Genetics
IS - 3
ER -