Biliary complications after liver transplantation: With special reference to the biliary cast syndrome and techniques of secondary duct repair

Thomas E. Starzl, Charles W. Putnam, John F. Hansbrough, Kendrick A. Porter, H. A.S. Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

175 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 93 consecutive cases of orthotopic liver transplantation, there were 24 examples of biliary obstruction and eight of bile fistula formation. Six of the obstructed livers developed biliary cast formation so extensive that the smaller intrahepatic ducts became plugged to an extent that they could no longer have been treated by surgical means. In each of the six cases, the most important causative factor was neglected obstruction of the large bile ducts with the intrahepatic lesions apparently being late and secondary. Stone and/or cast formation also occurred in other obstructed livers in the presence of bile fistulas, but these deposits were limited to the large ducts where they could have been or were removed. Although homograft bile undoubtedly has increased lithogenicity at certain postoperative times, the data from the present study have shown that biliary sludge formation essentially is always associated with defective bile duct reconstruction, and the observations have underscored the urgency with which reoperation must be considered. Techniques of secondary intervention have been described, with emphasis on conversion of cholecystojejunostomy to choledochojejunostomy. This operation has permitted salvage of homografts in eight of nine trials and the survival of seven patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-221
Number of pages10
JournalSurgery
Volume81
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1977
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biliary complications after liver transplantation: With special reference to the biliary cast syndrome and techniques of secondary duct repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this