Abstract
What happens to political parties after they experience a sudden and dramatic decline in their national vote share? The literature identifies two outcomes. Parties successfully adapt to change, or they fail and breakdown. I provide nuance to this dichotomy by conceptualizing party survival as a stage that lies between adaptation and breakdown. I argue that a party survives national-electoral crisis when it continues to fulfill at least one of its primary functions. It may survive as: a localized subnational electoral entity, a nationalized subnational entity, or as part of the public debate. I identify examples of each survival type in a region where electoral crises have been particularly acute: the Andean region of Latin America. These cases demonstrate that party survival matters for politics.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 125-145 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Comparative politics |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Between adaptation and breakdown: Conceptualizing party survival'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS