TY - JOUR
T1 - Best predictive single nephrometry score component to correlate with achievement of trifecta outcome in laparoscopic and robotic surgery
AU - Suppanuntaroek, Sappaya
AU - Garcia, Kyle
AU - Combates, Christopher
AU - Deal, Carly
AU - Paster, Irasema Concepción
AU - Morrill, Christian C.
AU - Batai, Ken
AU - Lee, Benjamin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: To evaluate the predictive value of individual components of the R.E.N.A.L scoring system for Laparoscopic (LPN) and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN). Methods: Patients that had undergone a Laparoscopic (LPN) or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN) between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. Our data collection included Race, Ethnicity, Age, BMI, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, and complications. Cases that achieved trifecta outcomes were designated as “Group A” and cases that did not achieve trifecta were “Group B”. All the data were collected using REDCap database. Results: A total of 111 cases were included, Group A consisted of 82% of all cases, whereas Group B 18%. Radius score demonstrated significant distinction concerning trifecta attainment and was the most predictive component of the 5 scoring metrics of the nephrometry system. In a subgroup analysis, R-score of 3 or a renal mass measuring ≥ 7 cm, was a significant independent negative predictor for trifecta outcomes, as well as tumor size at presentation. Conclusion: Renal nephrometry score is predictive of trifecta outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy. Radius of mass was the most effective predictive component of the nephrometry score for trifecta prediction.
AB - Background: To evaluate the predictive value of individual components of the R.E.N.A.L scoring system for Laparoscopic (LPN) and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN). Methods: Patients that had undergone a Laparoscopic (LPN) or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN) between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. Our data collection included Race, Ethnicity, Age, BMI, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, and complications. Cases that achieved trifecta outcomes were designated as “Group A” and cases that did not achieve trifecta were “Group B”. All the data were collected using REDCap database. Results: A total of 111 cases were included, Group A consisted of 82% of all cases, whereas Group B 18%. Radius score demonstrated significant distinction concerning trifecta attainment and was the most predictive component of the 5 scoring metrics of the nephrometry system. In a subgroup analysis, R-score of 3 or a renal mass measuring ≥ 7 cm, was a significant independent negative predictor for trifecta outcomes, as well as tumor size at presentation. Conclusion: Renal nephrometry score is predictive of trifecta outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy. Radius of mass was the most effective predictive component of the nephrometry score for trifecta prediction.
KW - Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
KW - Nephrometry system
KW - Renal cell carcinoma
KW - Robotic partial nephrectomy
KW - Trifecta outcomes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85197139806
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85197139806#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1186/s12894-024-01518-4
DO - 10.1186/s12894-024-01518-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 38943111
AN - SCOPUS:85197139806
SN - 1471-2490
VL - 24
JO - BMC Urology
JF - BMC Urology
IS - 1
M1 - 134
ER -