Abstract
Three studies examined the possibility that being liked intrinsically by others - for who one is - reduces self-esteem defense, whereas being liked for what one has achieved does not. All 3 studies contrasted the effects on self-esteem defense of liking based on intrinsic or achievement-related aspects of self. Study 1 showed that thoughts of being liked intrinsically reduced defensive bias toward downward social comparison. Study 2 demonstrated that being liked for intrinsic aspects of self reduced participants' tendency to defensively distance themselves from a negatively portrayed other. Study 3 revealed that being liked for intrinsic aspects of self encouraged a preference for upward over downward counterfactuals for a negative event. In all 3 studies, similar reductions in defensiveness were not found when liking was based on achievements. Discussion focuses on implications for understanding the functional value of different bases of self-worth.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 35-52 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2001 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Being accepted for who we are: Evidence that social validation of the intrinsic self reduces general defensiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS