TY - JOUR
T1 - Baseline and longitudinal change in isometric muscle strength prior to radiographic progression in osteoarthritic and pre-osteoarthritic knees - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
AU - Eckstein, F.
AU - Hitzl, W.
AU - Duryea, J.
AU - Kent Kwoh, C.
AU - Wirth, W.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study and data acquisition was funded by the OAI , a public-private partnership comprised of five contracts ( N01-AR-2-2258 ; N01-AR-2-2259 ; N01-AR-2-2260 ; N01-AR-2-2261 ; N01-AR-2-2262 ) funded by the National Institutes of Health , a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services , and conducted by the OAI Study Investigators. Private funding partners of the OAI include Merck Research Laboratories ; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline ; and Pfizer, Inc . Private sector funding for the OAI is managed by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health. The sponsors were not involved in the design and conduct of this particular study, in the analysis and interpretation of the data, and in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. However, this manuscript received the approval of the OAI Publications Committee based on a review of its scientific content and data interpretation.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Objective: To test whether cross-sectional or longitudinal measures of thigh muscle isometric strength differ between knees with and without subsequent radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), with particular focus on pre-osteoarthritic female knees (knees with risk factors but without definite radiographic KOA). Methods: Of 4,796 Osteoarthritis Initiative participants, 2,835 knees with Kellgren Lawrence grade (KLG) 0-3 had central X-ray readings, annual quantitative joint space width (JSW) and isometric muscle strength measurements (Good strength chair). Separate slope analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to determine differences in strength between "progressor" and "non-progressor" knees, after adjusting for age, body mass index, and pain. Results: 466 participant knees exceeded the smallest detectable JSW change during each of two observation intervals (year 2→4 and year 1→3) and were classified as progressors (213 women, 253 men; 128 KLG0/1, 330 KLG2/3); 946 participant knees did not exceed this threshold in either interval and were classified as non-progressors (588 women, 358 from men; 288KLG0/1, 658KLG2/3). Female progressor knees, including those with KLG0/1, tended to have lower extensor and flexor strength at year 2 and at baseline than those without progression, but the difference was not significant after adjusting for confounders. No significant difference was observed in longitudinal change of muscle strength (baseline→year 2) prior to radiographic progression. No significant differences were found for muscle strength in men, and none for change in strength concomitant with progression. Conclusion: This study provides no strong evidence that (changes in) isometric muscle strength precedes or is associated with structural (radiographic) progression of KOA.
AB - Objective: To test whether cross-sectional or longitudinal measures of thigh muscle isometric strength differ between knees with and without subsequent radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), with particular focus on pre-osteoarthritic female knees (knees with risk factors but without definite radiographic KOA). Methods: Of 4,796 Osteoarthritis Initiative participants, 2,835 knees with Kellgren Lawrence grade (KLG) 0-3 had central X-ray readings, annual quantitative joint space width (JSW) and isometric muscle strength measurements (Good strength chair). Separate slope analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to determine differences in strength between "progressor" and "non-progressor" knees, after adjusting for age, body mass index, and pain. Results: 466 participant knees exceeded the smallest detectable JSW change during each of two observation intervals (year 2→4 and year 1→3) and were classified as progressors (213 women, 253 men; 128 KLG0/1, 330 KLG2/3); 946 participant knees did not exceed this threshold in either interval and were classified as non-progressors (588 women, 358 from men; 288KLG0/1, 658KLG2/3). Female progressor knees, including those with KLG0/1, tended to have lower extensor and flexor strength at year 2 and at baseline than those without progression, but the difference was not significant after adjusting for confounders. No significant difference was observed in longitudinal change of muscle strength (baseline→year 2) prior to radiographic progression. No significant differences were found for muscle strength in men, and none for change in strength concomitant with progression. Conclusion: This study provides no strong evidence that (changes in) isometric muscle strength precedes or is associated with structural (radiographic) progression of KOA.
KW - Knee osteoarthritis
KW - Muscle strength
KW - Progression
KW - Radiography
KW - Structure modification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875898905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875898905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joca.2013.02.658
DO - 10.1016/j.joca.2013.02.658
M3 - Article
C2 - 23473978
AN - SCOPUS:84875898905
SN - 1063-4584
VL - 21
SP - 682
EP - 690
JO - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
JF - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
IS - 5
ER -