Abstract
The detection of deception is a promising but challenging task. A systematic discussion of automated Linguistics Based Cues (LBC) to deception has rarely been touched before. The experiment studied the effectiveness of automated LBC in the context of text-based asynchronous computer mediated communication (TA-CMC). Twenty-seven cues either extracted from the prior research or created for this study were clustered into nine linguistics constructs: quantity, diversity, complexity, specificity, expressivity, informality, affect, uncertainty, and non-immediacy. A test of the selected LBC in a simulated TA-CMC experiment showed that: (1) a systematic analysis of linguistic information could be useful in the detection of deception; (2) some existing LBC were effective as expected, while some others turned out in the opposite direction to the prediction of the prior research; and (3) some newly discovered linguistic constructs and their component LBC were helpful in differentiating deception from truth.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 81-106 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Group Decision and Negotiation |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2004 |
Keywords
- Computer-mediated communication
- Deception
- Deception detection
- Linguistics based cue
- Natural language processing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Decision Sciences
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- General Social Sciences
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS