TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated MRI-based classification of primary progressive aphasia variants
AU - Wilson, Stephen M.
AU - Ogar, Jennifer M.
AU - Laluz, Victor
AU - Growdon, Matthew
AU - Jang, Jung
AU - Glenn, Shenly
AU - Miller, Bruce L.
AU - Weiner, Michael W.
AU - Gorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Gil Rabinovici, Kate Rankin, Howie Rosen, Maya Henry, Francisco Melo and Ismael Vergara for helpful discussions, three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, and all of the patients, caregivers and volunteers for their participation. This research was supported in part by: National Institutes of Health (NINDS R01 NS050915, NIA P50 AG03006, NIA P01 AG019724); State of California (DHS 04-35516); Alzheimer's Disease Research Center of California (03-75271 DHS/ADP/ARCC); Larry L. Hillblom Foundation; John Douglas French Foundation for Alzheimer's Research; Koret Foundation; McBean Family Foundation.
PY - 2009/10/1
Y1 - 2009/10/1
N2 - Degeneration of language regions in the dominant hemisphere can result in primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive deficits in speech and/or language function. Recent studies have identified three variants of PPA: progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA), semantic dementia (SD) and logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA). Each variant is associated with characteristic linguistic features, distinct patterns of brain atrophy, and different likelihoods of particular underlying pathogenic processes, which makes correct differential diagnosis highly clinically relevant. Evaluation of linguistic behavior can be challenging for non-specialists, and neuroimaging findings in single subjects are often difficult to evaluate by eye. We investigated the utility of automated structural MR image analysis to discriminate PPA variants (N = 86) from each other and from normal controls (N = 115). T1 images were preprocessed to obtain modulated grey matter (GM) images. Feature selection was performed with principal components analysis (PCA) on GM images as well as images of lateralized atrophy. PC coefficients were classified with linear support vector machines, and a cross-validation scheme was used to obtain accuracy rates for generalization to novel cases. The overall mean accuracy in discriminating between pairs of groups was 92.2%. For one pair of groups, PNFA and SD, we also investigated the utility of including several linguistic variables as features. Models with both imaging and linguistic features performed better than models with only imaging or only linguistic features. These results suggest that automated methods could assist in the differential diagnosis of PPA variants, enabling therapies to be targeted to likely underlying etiologies.
AB - Degeneration of language regions in the dominant hemisphere can result in primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive deficits in speech and/or language function. Recent studies have identified three variants of PPA: progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA), semantic dementia (SD) and logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA). Each variant is associated with characteristic linguistic features, distinct patterns of brain atrophy, and different likelihoods of particular underlying pathogenic processes, which makes correct differential diagnosis highly clinically relevant. Evaluation of linguistic behavior can be challenging for non-specialists, and neuroimaging findings in single subjects are often difficult to evaluate by eye. We investigated the utility of automated structural MR image analysis to discriminate PPA variants (N = 86) from each other and from normal controls (N = 115). T1 images were preprocessed to obtain modulated grey matter (GM) images. Feature selection was performed with principal components analysis (PCA) on GM images as well as images of lateralized atrophy. PC coefficients were classified with linear support vector machines, and a cross-validation scheme was used to obtain accuracy rates for generalization to novel cases. The overall mean accuracy in discriminating between pairs of groups was 92.2%. For one pair of groups, PNFA and SD, we also investigated the utility of including several linguistic variables as features. Models with both imaging and linguistic features performed better than models with only imaging or only linguistic features. These results suggest that automated methods could assist in the differential diagnosis of PPA variants, enabling therapies to be targeted to likely underlying etiologies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651054973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651054973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.085
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.085
M3 - Article
C2 - 19501654
AN - SCOPUS:67651054973
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 47
SP - 1558
EP - 1567
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - 4
ER -