TY - JOUR
T1 - Authority beyond institutions
T2 - the expert’s multivocal process of gaining and sustaining authoritativeness
AU - Menchik, Daniel A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - After briefly examining how expert authority has been constructed through an “associative” perspective, which privileges institutional relationships, I argue for the complimentary adoption of an “enactive” perspective, which centers on how experts demonstrate and earn authority with individual clients and communities. I synthesize scholarship revealing the uses of communication in expert–client relationships to argue that an enactive perspective allows for the study of how experts use “reiterative multivocality” to demonstrate to clients that they possess expert knowledge that is tailored to their interests, stakes, and values. Reiterative multivocality is the process of reaffirming, in different voices and formats, terms and symbols considered centrally important by other experts at the time. It allows experts to communicate authoritativeness through reiterating signs that reflect the collective’s efforts to maintain authority in response to shifts in client expectations. I focus on the case of expert authoritativeness in medicine, examining how it is constructed and maintained. The article argues that authority is not rooted solely in institutions but is developed and maintained by individual experts and clients, and that the language and processes used in the construction of authoritativeness is of central importance to sociologists. I expand upon the implications of both perspectives for method.
AB - After briefly examining how expert authority has been constructed through an “associative” perspective, which privileges institutional relationships, I argue for the complimentary adoption of an “enactive” perspective, which centers on how experts demonstrate and earn authority with individual clients and communities. I synthesize scholarship revealing the uses of communication in expert–client relationships to argue that an enactive perspective allows for the study of how experts use “reiterative multivocality” to demonstrate to clients that they possess expert knowledge that is tailored to their interests, stakes, and values. Reiterative multivocality is the process of reaffirming, in different voices and formats, terms and symbols considered centrally important by other experts at the time. It allows experts to communicate authoritativeness through reiterating signs that reflect the collective’s efforts to maintain authority in response to shifts in client expectations. I focus on the case of expert authoritativeness in medicine, examining how it is constructed and maintained. The article argues that authority is not rooted solely in institutions but is developed and maintained by individual experts and clients, and that the language and processes used in the construction of authoritativeness is of central importance to sociologists. I expand upon the implications of both perspectives for method.
KW - Authority
KW - Expertise
KW - Medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081644922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081644922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1057/s41290-020-00100-3
DO - 10.1057/s41290-020-00100-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081644922
SN - 2049-7113
VL - 9
SP - 490
EP - 517
JO - American Journal of Cultural Sociology
JF - American Journal of Cultural Sociology
IS - 4
ER -