Auditory brainstem and middle latency evoked response sensitivity near threshold

Frank E. Musiek, Nathan A. Geurkink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations


Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and middle latency evoked response (MLER) testing have been used successfully for assessing hearing sensitivity electrophysiologically. Though both procedures have their proponents, ABR seems to be the more popular of the two. However, this study shows that overall, MLER waves occur with greater frequency at low sensation levels than ABR waves. Specifically, MLER wave Pa was the most sensitive wave, followed by ABR wave V, MLER wave Pb, ABR wave III, MLER wave Pc, and ABR wave I. Latencies were more consistent and predictable for ABR than MLER. However, as expected, amplitudes for MLER waves were greater than those for ABR. Given these results, those involved in measuring hearing sensitivity electrophysiologically are encouraged to consider the potential of the MLER measure and not limit their scope of assessment to ABR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)236-240
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1981
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology


Dive into the research topics of 'Auditory brainstem and middle latency evoked response sensitivity near threshold'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this