TY - JOUR
T1 - Asteroidal regoliths
AU - Housen, Kevin R.
AU - Wilkening, Laurel L.
AU - Chapman, Clark R.
AU - Greenberg, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has been supportedin part by NASA DAVIS, D. R., AND CHAPMAN, C. R. (1977)F. urther GrantN SG 7011t o theU niversitoyf Arizonaa ndC on-asteroidc ollisionale volutionB. ull. Amer. Astron. tractsN ASW 2909a ndNASW 3208t o the Planetary Soc. 9, 461 (abstractp; aperin preparation). ScienceIn stituteT. his is PlanetaryS cienceI nstitute DEGEWlJ, J., AND ZELLNER, B. (1978)A. steroids ur-contributionN umber1 07. facev ariegationL.u nar Planet. Sci. IX, 235-237. DESONVERSC, ., AND JEROME, D. Y. (1977)T. he Mal-vernh owarditeA: petrologicaaln dc hemicadl iscus-sion.G eochim. Cosmochim. Acta 41, 81-86. DOHNANVl, J. S. (1976).S ourceso f interplanetary dust: Asteroids.P roc. IAU Colloquium No. 31, Heidelberg, June 10-13, 1975. Springer-VerlagB,e r-lin/New York. DOLLFUS,A . (1971)P. hysicals tudieso f asteroidbs y polarizationo f the light, In Physical Studies of Minor Planets (T. Gehrels,E d.), pp. 95-116N. ASA SP-267. DOLLFUS,A ., GEAKE, J. E., MANDEVILLE, J. L., AND ZELLNER, B. (1977)T. hen atureo f asteroids urfaces from optical polarimetry.I n Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites---Interrelations, Evolution and Origins (A. H. DelsemmeE, d.), pp. 243-251.U niv. of Toledo. DROZD,R . J., HOHENBERG,C , M., MORGAN, C. J,, AND RALSTON, C. E. (1974)C. osmic-raeyx posure historya t theA pollo1 6a ndo therlu nars ites:L unar surfaced ynamicsG. eochim. Cosmochim. Acta 38, 1625-1642.
PY - 1979/9
Y1 - 1979/9
N2 - We develop a physical model for the evolution of regoliths on small bodies and apply it to the asteroids and meteorite parent bodies. The model considers global deposition of that fraction of cratering ejecta that is not lost to space. It follows the build up of regolith on a typical region, removed from the larger craters which are the source of most regolith blankets. Later in the evolution, larger craters saturate the surface and are incorporated into the typical region; their net ejection of materials to space causes the elevation of the typical region to decrease and once-buried regolith becomes susceptible to ejection or gardening. The model is applied to cases of both strong, cohesive bodies and to bodies of weak, unconsolidated materials. Evolution of regolith depths and gardening rates are followed until a sufficiently large impact occurs that fractures the entire asteroid. (Larger asteroids are not dispersed, however, and evolve mergaregoliths from multiple generations of surficial regoliths mixed into their interiors.) We find that large, strong asteroids generate surficial regoliths of a few kilometers depth while strong asteroids smaller than 10-km diameter generate negligible regoliths. Our model does not treat large, weak asteroids, because their cratering ejecta fail to surround such bodies; regolith evolution is probably similar to that of the Moon. Small, weak asteroids of 1- to 10-km diameter generate centimeter- to meter-scale regoliths. In all cases studied, blanketing rates exceed excavation rates, so asteroid regoliths are rarely, if ever, gardened and should be very immature measured by lunar standards. They should exhibit many of the characteristics of the brecciated, gas-rich meteorites; intact foreign clasts, relatively low-exposure durations to galactic and solar cosmic rays low solar gas contents, minimal evidence for vitrification and agglutinate formation, etc. Both large, strong asteroids and small, weak ones provide regolith environments compatible with those inferred for the parent bodies of brecciated meteorites. But from volumetric calculations, we conclude that most brecciated meteorites formed on the surfaces of, and were recycled through the interiors of, parent bodies at least several tens of kilometers in diameter. The implications of our regolith model are consistent with properties inferred for asteroid regoliths from a variety of astronomical measurements of asteroids, although such data do not constrain regolith properties nearly as strongly as meteoritical evidence Our picture of substantial asteroidal regoliths produced predominantly by blanketing differs from earlier hypotheses that asteroidal regoliths might be thin or absent and that short surface exposure of asteroidal materials is due chiefly to erosion rather than blanketing.
AB - We develop a physical model for the evolution of regoliths on small bodies and apply it to the asteroids and meteorite parent bodies. The model considers global deposition of that fraction of cratering ejecta that is not lost to space. It follows the build up of regolith on a typical region, removed from the larger craters which are the source of most regolith blankets. Later in the evolution, larger craters saturate the surface and are incorporated into the typical region; their net ejection of materials to space causes the elevation of the typical region to decrease and once-buried regolith becomes susceptible to ejection or gardening. The model is applied to cases of both strong, cohesive bodies and to bodies of weak, unconsolidated materials. Evolution of regolith depths and gardening rates are followed until a sufficiently large impact occurs that fractures the entire asteroid. (Larger asteroids are not dispersed, however, and evolve mergaregoliths from multiple generations of surficial regoliths mixed into their interiors.) We find that large, strong asteroids generate surficial regoliths of a few kilometers depth while strong asteroids smaller than 10-km diameter generate negligible regoliths. Our model does not treat large, weak asteroids, because their cratering ejecta fail to surround such bodies; regolith evolution is probably similar to that of the Moon. Small, weak asteroids of 1- to 10-km diameter generate centimeter- to meter-scale regoliths. In all cases studied, blanketing rates exceed excavation rates, so asteroid regoliths are rarely, if ever, gardened and should be very immature measured by lunar standards. They should exhibit many of the characteristics of the brecciated, gas-rich meteorites; intact foreign clasts, relatively low-exposure durations to galactic and solar cosmic rays low solar gas contents, minimal evidence for vitrification and agglutinate formation, etc. Both large, strong asteroids and small, weak ones provide regolith environments compatible with those inferred for the parent bodies of brecciated meteorites. But from volumetric calculations, we conclude that most brecciated meteorites formed on the surfaces of, and were recycled through the interiors of, parent bodies at least several tens of kilometers in diameter. The implications of our regolith model are consistent with properties inferred for asteroid regoliths from a variety of astronomical measurements of asteroids, although such data do not constrain regolith properties nearly as strongly as meteoritical evidence Our picture of substantial asteroidal regoliths produced predominantly by blanketing differs from earlier hypotheses that asteroidal regoliths might be thin or absent and that short surface exposure of asteroidal materials is due chiefly to erosion rather than blanketing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49249141240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49249141240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0019-1035(79)90145-3
DO - 10.1016/0019-1035(79)90145-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:49249141240
SN - 0019-1035
VL - 39
SP - 317
EP - 351
JO - Icarus
JF - Icarus
IS - 3
ER -