TY - JOUR
T1 - Associations between shared care and patient experiences among older cancer survivors
AU - Halpern, Michael T.
AU - Cohen, Julia
AU - Lines, Lisa M.
AU - Mollica, Michelle A.
AU - Kent, Erin E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute (contract number HHSN261201000166U and HHSN261201500132U). Analyses presented in this manuscript were initiated when MTH was an employee of RTI International and EEK was an employee of ICF, Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Purpose: Cancer survivors have unique medical care needs. “Shared care,” delivered by both oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs), may better address these needs. Little information is available on differences in outcomes among survivors receiving shared care versus oncologist-led or PCP-led care. This study compared experiences of care for survivors receiving shared care, oncologist-led, PCP-led, or other care patterns. Methods: We used SEER-CAHPS data, including NCI’s SEER registry data, Medicare claims, and Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey responses. Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries age ≥ 65 years in SEER-CAHPS with breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, renal, or prostate cancers or hematologic malignancies who responded to a Medicare CAHPS survey ≥ 18 months post-diagnosis were included. CAHPS measures included ratings of overall care, personal doctor, specialist physician, health plan, prescription drug plan, and five composite scores. Survivorship care patterns were identified using proportions of oncologist, PCP, and other physician encounters. Multivariable regressions examined associations between care patterns and CAHPS outcomes. Results: Among 10,132 survivors, 15% received shared care, 10% oncologist-led, 33% PCP-led, and 42% other. Compared with shared care, we found no significant differences in experiences of care except for getting needed drugs (lower scores for PCP-led and other care patterns). Sensitivity analyses using different patterns of care definitions similarly showed no associations between survivorship care pattern and experience of care. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study dataset, survivors age 65+ receiving shared care reported similar experiences of care to those receiving oncologist-led, PCP-led, and other patterns of care. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Shared care may not provide survivor-perceived benefits compared with other care patterns.
AB - Purpose: Cancer survivors have unique medical care needs. “Shared care,” delivered by both oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs), may better address these needs. Little information is available on differences in outcomes among survivors receiving shared care versus oncologist-led or PCP-led care. This study compared experiences of care for survivors receiving shared care, oncologist-led, PCP-led, or other care patterns. Methods: We used SEER-CAHPS data, including NCI’s SEER registry data, Medicare claims, and Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey responses. Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries age ≥ 65 years in SEER-CAHPS with breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, renal, or prostate cancers or hematologic malignancies who responded to a Medicare CAHPS survey ≥ 18 months post-diagnosis were included. CAHPS measures included ratings of overall care, personal doctor, specialist physician, health plan, prescription drug plan, and five composite scores. Survivorship care patterns were identified using proportions of oncologist, PCP, and other physician encounters. Multivariable regressions examined associations between care patterns and CAHPS outcomes. Results: Among 10,132 survivors, 15% received shared care, 10% oncologist-led, 33% PCP-led, and 42% other. Compared with shared care, we found no significant differences in experiences of care except for getting needed drugs (lower scores for PCP-led and other care patterns). Sensitivity analyses using different patterns of care definitions similarly showed no associations between survivorship care pattern and experience of care. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study dataset, survivors age 65+ receiving shared care reported similar experiences of care to those receiving oncologist-led, PCP-led, and other patterns of care. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Shared care may not provide survivor-perceived benefits compared with other care patterns.
KW - Claims analyses
KW - Oncology
KW - Patient satisfaction
KW - Physician practice patterns
KW - SEER program
KW - Survivorship
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091166144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091166144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11764-020-00934-3
DO - 10.1007/s11764-020-00934-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 32948992
AN - SCOPUS:85091166144
SN - 1932-2259
VL - 15
SP - 333
EP - 343
JO - Journal of Cancer Survivorship
JF - Journal of Cancer Survivorship
IS - 2
ER -