TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of thermochemistry modeling for hypersonic flow over a double cone
AU - Holloway, Michael E.
AU - Hanquist, Kyle M.
AU - Boyd, Iain D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by Michael Emerson Holloway.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The influence of different assumptions for thermochemistry modeling in hypersonic flow over a double-cone geometry is investigated. A computational fluid dynamics analysis is used to study the double cone in three different thermochemical cases, nonequilibrium flow, equilibrium flow, and frozen flow, for four different mixtures of nitrogen and oxygen. Specific areas of interest include the thermochemistry model effects on the flowfield and surface properties. The resulting aerodynamic loads are compared with experiments and indicate that thermochemistry modeling assumptions play a significant role in determining surface properties. It is also shown that heat loading is more sensitive to thermochemical modeling than drag and suggests that an accurate measurement of surface heat transfer is of particular interest. Careful analysis also reveals that high-enthalpy and pure oxygen flows are particularly sensitive to the thermochemistry model assumed. Consistent overprediction or underprediction of pressure drag and heat load by all three chemistry models for most of the cases considered indicates a fundamental difference between the actual experiments and the simulations, thus limiting the usefulness of the double-cone data for validation of thermochemistry models.
AB - The influence of different assumptions for thermochemistry modeling in hypersonic flow over a double-cone geometry is investigated. A computational fluid dynamics analysis is used to study the double cone in three different thermochemical cases, nonequilibrium flow, equilibrium flow, and frozen flow, for four different mixtures of nitrogen and oxygen. Specific areas of interest include the thermochemistry model effects on the flowfield and surface properties. The resulting aerodynamic loads are compared with experiments and indicate that thermochemistry modeling assumptions play a significant role in determining surface properties. It is also shown that heat loading is more sensitive to thermochemical modeling than drag and suggests that an accurate measurement of surface heat transfer is of particular interest. Careful analysis also reveals that high-enthalpy and pure oxygen flows are particularly sensitive to the thermochemistry model assumed. Consistent overprediction or underprediction of pressure drag and heat load by all three chemistry models for most of the cases considered indicates a fundamental difference between the actual experiments and the simulations, thus limiting the usefulness of the double-cone data for validation of thermochemistry models.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087614094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087614094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/1.T5792
DO - 10.2514/1.T5792
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087614094
SN - 0887-8722
VL - 34
SP - 538
EP - 547
JO - Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer
JF - Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer
IS - 3
ER -