TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of Coliphage Surrogates for Testing Drinking Water Treatment Devices
AU - Gerba, Charles P.
AU - Abd-Elmaksoud, Sherif
AU - Newick, Huikheng
AU - El-Esnawy, Nagwa A.
AU - Barakat, Ahmed
AU - Ghanem, Hossam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Test protocols have been developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to test water treatment devices/systems that are used at the individual and home levels to ensure the removal of waterborne viruses. The goal of this study was to assess if coliphage surrogates could be used in this testing in place of the currently required use of animal or human enteric viruses. Five different coliphages (MS-2, PRD1, ΦX-174, Qβ, and fr) were compared to the removal of poliovirus type 1 (LSc-2ab) by eight different water treatment devices/systems using a general case and a challenge case (high organic load, dissolved solids, and turbidity) test water as defined by the USEPA. The performance of the units was rated as a pass/fail based on a 4 log removal/inactivation of the viruses. In all cases, a failure or a pass of the units/system for poliovirus also corresponded to a pass/fail by all of the coliphages. In summary, in using pass/fail criteria as recommended under USEPA guidelines for testing water treatment device/systems, the use of coliphages should be considered as an alternative to reduce cost and time of testing such devices/systems.
AB - Test protocols have been developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to test water treatment devices/systems that are used at the individual and home levels to ensure the removal of waterborne viruses. The goal of this study was to assess if coliphage surrogates could be used in this testing in place of the currently required use of animal or human enteric viruses. Five different coliphages (MS-2, PRD1, ΦX-174, Qβ, and fr) were compared to the removal of poliovirus type 1 (LSc-2ab) by eight different water treatment devices/systems using a general case and a challenge case (high organic load, dissolved solids, and turbidity) test water as defined by the USEPA. The performance of the units was rated as a pass/fail based on a 4 log removal/inactivation of the viruses. In all cases, a failure or a pass of the units/system for poliovirus also corresponded to a pass/fail by all of the coliphages. In summary, in using pass/fail criteria as recommended under USEPA guidelines for testing water treatment device/systems, the use of coliphages should be considered as an alternative to reduce cost and time of testing such devices/systems.
KW - Coliphages
KW - Drinking water
KW - Point-of-use treatment
KW - Poliovirus
KW - Surrogates
KW - Water treatment devices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925535245&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925535245&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12560-014-9173-1
DO - 10.1007/s12560-014-9173-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 25399400
AN - SCOPUS:84925535245
SN - 1867-0334
VL - 7
SP - 27
EP - 31
JO - Food and Environmental Virology
JF - Food and Environmental Virology
IS - 1
ER -