TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the Preconditions for Communication Influence on Decision Making
T2 - The North American Quitline Consortium
AU - Bonito, Joseph A.
AU - Ruppel, Erin K.
AU - Saul, Jessie E.
AU - Leischow, Scott J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The KIQNIC project is funded by Grant Number R01CA128638-04 from the National Institutes of Health to the University of Arizona Cancer Center. Additional support is provided by Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG - CA 023074).
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - The network of North American quitlines is a loose confederation of telephone-based smoking cessation professionals, including smoking cessation counseling providers, funders, researcher and policy advocates. Each quitline has some leeway in the types of services it provides, and the purpose of this article is to identify factors that explain such choices. Representatives from quitline organizations responded to a survey regarding the importance of several items that were hypothesized to influence general intentions to adopt and implement new cessation methods. Results indicate that internal (to the quitline) constraints are positively associated with consensus processes and that implementation of practices in general was more likely if consensus processes were used. Unilateral decision making (one person within an organization makes decisions for the quitline on his/her own) was unrelated to either internal or external constraints and was negatively associated with adoption of quitline practices. Discussion focuses on factors that influence consensus decision-making processes beyond those investigated in the article.
AB - The network of North American quitlines is a loose confederation of telephone-based smoking cessation professionals, including smoking cessation counseling providers, funders, researcher and policy advocates. Each quitline has some leeway in the types of services it provides, and the purpose of this article is to identify factors that explain such choices. Representatives from quitline organizations responded to a survey regarding the importance of several items that were hypothesized to influence general intentions to adopt and implement new cessation methods. Results indicate that internal (to the quitline) constraints are positively associated with consensus processes and that implementation of practices in general was more likely if consensus processes were used. Unilateral decision making (one person within an organization makes decisions for the quitline on his/her own) was unrelated to either internal or external constraints and was negatively associated with adoption of quitline practices. Discussion focuses on factors that influence consensus decision-making processes beyond those investigated in the article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875585665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875585665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10410236.2012.673245
DO - 10.1080/10410236.2012.673245
M3 - Article
C2 - 22582759
AN - SCOPUS:84875585665
SN - 1041-0236
VL - 28
SP - 248
EP - 259
JO - Health Communication
JF - Health Communication
IS - 3
ER -