TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence in Depression–Medication Enhancement (AID-ME)
T2 - A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Deep-Learning-Enabled Clinical Decision Support System for Personalized Depression Treatment Selection and Management
AU - Benrimoh, David
AU - Whitmore, Kate
AU - Richard, Maud
AU - Golden, Grace
AU - Perlman, Kelly
AU - Jalali, Sara
AU - Friesen, Timothy
AU - Barkat, Youcef
AU - Mehltretter, Joseph
AU - Fratila, Robert
AU - Armstrong, Caitrin
AU - Israel, Sonia
AU - Popescu, Christina
AU - Karp, Jordan F.
AU - Parikh, Sagar V.
AU - Golchi, Shirin
AU - Moodie, Erica E.M.
AU - Shen, Junwei
AU - Gifuni, Anthony J.
AU - Ferrari, Manuela
AU - Sapra, Mamta
AU - Kloiber, Stefan
AU - Pinard, Georges F.
AU - Dunlop, Boadie W.
AU - Looper, Karl
AU - Ranganathan, Mohini
AU - Enault, Martin
AU - Beaulieu, Serge
AU - Rej, Soham
AU - Hersson-Edery, Fanny
AU - Steiner, Warren
AU - Anacleto, Alexandra
AU - Qassim, Sabrina
AU - McGuire-Snieckus, Rebecca
AU - Margolese, Howard C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Background: There has been increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for the personalization of major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment selection and management, but clinical studies are lacking. We tested whether a CDSS that combines an AI which predicts remission probabilities for individual antidepressants and a clinical algorithm based on treatment can improve MDD outcomes. Methods: This was a multicenter, cluster randomized, patient-and-rater blinded and clinician-partially-blinded, active-controlled trial that recruited outpatient adults with moderate or greater severity MDD. All patients had access to a patient portal to complete questionnaires. Clinicians in the active group had access to the CDSS; clinicians in the active-control group received patient questionnaires; both groups received guideline training. Primary outcome was remission (<11 points on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) at study exit. Results: Forty-seven clinicians were recruited at 9 sites. Of 74 eligible patients, 61 patients completed a postbaseline MADRS and were analyzed. There were no differences in baseline MADRS (P= .153). There were more remitters in the active (n = 12, 28.6%) than in the active-control (0%) group (P=.012, Fisher’s exact). Of 3 serious adverse events, none were caused by the CDSS. Speed of improvementwashigherintheactivethan the control group (1.26 vs 0.37, P=.03). Conclusions: While limited by sample size and the lack of primary care clinicians, these results demonstrate preliminary evidence that longitudinal use of an AI-CDSS can improve outcomes in moderate and greater severity MDD.
AB - Background: There has been increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for the personalization of major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment selection and management, but clinical studies are lacking. We tested whether a CDSS that combines an AI which predicts remission probabilities for individual antidepressants and a clinical algorithm based on treatment can improve MDD outcomes. Methods: This was a multicenter, cluster randomized, patient-and-rater blinded and clinician-partially-blinded, active-controlled trial that recruited outpatient adults with moderate or greater severity MDD. All patients had access to a patient portal to complete questionnaires. Clinicians in the active group had access to the CDSS; clinicians in the active-control group received patient questionnaires; both groups received guideline training. Primary outcome was remission (<11 points on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) at study exit. Results: Forty-seven clinicians were recruited at 9 sites. Of 74 eligible patients, 61 patients completed a postbaseline MADRS and were analyzed. There were no differences in baseline MADRS (P= .153). There were more remitters in the active (n = 12, 28.6%) than in the active-control (0%) group (P=.012, Fisher’s exact). Of 3 serious adverse events, none were caused by the CDSS. Speed of improvementwashigherintheactivethan the control group (1.26 vs 0.37, P=.03). Conclusions: While limited by sample size and the lack of primary care clinicians, these results demonstrate preliminary evidence that longitudinal use of an AI-CDSS can improve outcomes in moderate and greater severity MDD.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015019531
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015019531#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.4088/JCP.24m15634
DO - 10.4088/JCP.24m15634
M3 - Article
C2 - 40875536
AN - SCOPUS:105015019531
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 86
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
IS - 3
M1 - 24m15634
ER -