Artifact densities and assemblage formation: Evidence from Tabun Cave

Steven L. Kuhn, Amy E. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations


Archaeological assemblages are fundamentally records of discard behavior. Lewis Binford's pioneering ethnoarchaeological research focused attention on the differing pathways that lead to artifacts being abandoned in different locations on the landscape. Recurring relationships between artifact density and assemblage content at Middle and Upper Paleolithic sites reflect simple behavioral dynamics pertaining to artifact production and discard. In the very long archaeological sequence from A. Jelinek's excavations at Tabun Cave, Mousterian assemblages show the expected pattern, but earlier Acheulean, Amudian and Yabrudian assemblages do not. In combination with evidence that different classes of artifacts were discarded at different rates, these results suggest that land use and raw material provisioning in the later Middle Pleistocene were organized differently than they were among later populations of Neanderthals and modern humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-16
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Anthropological Archaeology
StatePublished - May 1 2015


  • Artifact discard behavior
  • Israel
  • Land use
  • Middle Pleistocene
  • Mousterian assemblages
  • Raw material procurement
  • Tabun Cave

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Archaeology
  • History
  • Archaeology


Dive into the research topics of 'Artifact densities and assemblage formation: Evidence from Tabun Cave'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this