Abstract
While the search for the neural basis of the language of thought is a landable enterprise, and the article by Hurford a valiant first attempt, we argue that in investigating the argument structure of natural language it will ultimately prove more fruitful to consider the restrictions forced on the system by its inherently syntactic character.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 297-298 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2003 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience