TY - JOUR
T1 - APAP and alternative titration methods
AU - Ahmed, Omer
AU - Parthasarathy, Sairam
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Grant No. HL095748 from the National Institutes of Health . Dr Parthasarathy received $200,000 of research grant funding between 2006–2007 from Respironics, Inc. Dr Ahmed does not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
PY - 2010/9
Y1 - 2010/9
N2 - Positive airway pressure therapy (PAP) is a commonly prescribed treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Traditionally, a sleep technician determined the optimal pressure for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) through manual titration of the device during polysomnography. However, alternative methods for determination of optimal PAP, such as autotitrating PAP (APAP), have seen tremendous growth over the past decade. The purpose of this article is to improve understanding of the currently available alternative methods for titration of PAP in patients with SDB with special emphasis on OSA. Recent prospective randomized studies of alternative methods of titration suggest that pressure determinations made by these devices are comparable to traditional manual titrations made in the sleep laboratory. Obstacles to the adoption of these alternative modes of titration into daily practice may be attributable to issues surrounding appropriate patient selection, differences between devices, reimbursement policies of third-party payors, consensus among sleep experts, and individual physicians' practice patterns and volumes. Although newer generations and types of APAP devices are entering the sleep field constantly, providers' knowledge and time availability remain limiting factors. Tremendous growth is occurring in technology and scientific evidence supporting alternative modes of PAP titration for SDB, but barriers to implementation remain.
AB - Positive airway pressure therapy (PAP) is a commonly prescribed treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Traditionally, a sleep technician determined the optimal pressure for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) through manual titration of the device during polysomnography. However, alternative methods for determination of optimal PAP, such as autotitrating PAP (APAP), have seen tremendous growth over the past decade. The purpose of this article is to improve understanding of the currently available alternative methods for titration of PAP in patients with SDB with special emphasis on OSA. Recent prospective randomized studies of alternative methods of titration suggest that pressure determinations made by these devices are comparable to traditional manual titrations made in the sleep laboratory. Obstacles to the adoption of these alternative modes of titration into daily practice may be attributable to issues surrounding appropriate patient selection, differences between devices, reimbursement policies of third-party payors, consensus among sleep experts, and individual physicians' practice patterns and volumes. Although newer generations and types of APAP devices are entering the sleep field constantly, providers' knowledge and time availability remain limiting factors. Tremendous growth is occurring in technology and scientific evidence supporting alternative modes of PAP titration for SDB, but barriers to implementation remain.
KW - Adherence
KW - Artificial respiration
KW - Compliance
KW - Continuous positive airway pressure
KW - Obstructive sleep apnea
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956652787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956652787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsmc.2010.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jsmc.2010.05.010
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:77956652787
SN - 1556-407X
VL - 5
SP - 361
EP - 368
JO - Sleep Medicine Clinics
JF - Sleep Medicine Clinics
IS - 3
ER -