TY - JOUR
T1 - Antinociceptive profile of biphalin, a dimeric enkephalin analog
AU - Horan, P. J.
AU - Mattia, A.
AU - Bilsky, E. J.
AU - Weber, S.
AU - Davis, T. P.
AU - Yamamura, H. I.
AU - Malatynska, E.
AU - Appleyard, S. M.
AU - Slaninova, J.
AU - Misicka, A.
AU - Lipkowski, A. W.
AU - Hruby, V. J.
AU - Porreca, F.
PY - 1993
Y1 - 1993
N2 - The dimeric enkephalin biphalin (Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Phe-NH)2 was evaluated in mice using antinociceptive, gastrointestinal and physical dependence paradigms and compared with that of morphine (reference μ agonist) and etorphine (ultrapotent opioid agonist). Intracerebroventricular biphalin was 6.7- and 257-fold more potent than etorphine or morphine in eliciting antinociception. When administered i.t., biphalin produced only a 60% maximal antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick test even when given at doses up to 3 orders of magnitude higher than those effective i.c.v.; morphine was equipotent in this assay when given i.c.v. or i.t. Both morphine and biphalin were equipotent after i.p. administration. In spite of its antinociceptive effectiveness after i.p. administration, only a small fraction of [125I]biphalin was shown to penetrate to the brain (0.051 ± 0.011%, at 20 min). After i.c.v. administration, biphalin antinociception was antagonized by receptor selective doses of β-funaltrexamine (μ antagonist), naloxonazine (μ1 antagonist), ICI 174,864 (δ antagonist) and [D- Ala2,Cys4]deltorphin (δ2 antagonist), but not by [D- Ala2,Leu5,Cys6]enkephalin (δ1 antagonist) or nor-binaltorphimine (κ antagonist), whereas etorphine antinociception was significantly antagonized only by β-funaltrexamine and naloxonazine. Intracerebroventricular biphalin inhibited gastrointestinal propulsion at doses 8-fold higher than those producing i.c.v. antinociception; i.c.v. morphine showed a similar antinociceptive and gastrointestinal propulsion A50. Intraperitoneal biphalin, but not i.p. morphine, showed little, if any, physical dependence, but both biphalin and morphine produced significant physical dependence when equiantinociceptive doses were infused i.c.v. These results demonstrate an unusual profile for biphalin which suggests a potentially novel mechanism which may involve, in part, the putative opioid receptor complex of physically or functionally interacting μ and δ2 opioid receptors. Biphalin may thus represent the first in a series of such compounds which may lead to significant therapeutic advantages.
AB - The dimeric enkephalin biphalin (Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Phe-NH)2 was evaluated in mice using antinociceptive, gastrointestinal and physical dependence paradigms and compared with that of morphine (reference μ agonist) and etorphine (ultrapotent opioid agonist). Intracerebroventricular biphalin was 6.7- and 257-fold more potent than etorphine or morphine in eliciting antinociception. When administered i.t., biphalin produced only a 60% maximal antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick test even when given at doses up to 3 orders of magnitude higher than those effective i.c.v.; morphine was equipotent in this assay when given i.c.v. or i.t. Both morphine and biphalin were equipotent after i.p. administration. In spite of its antinociceptive effectiveness after i.p. administration, only a small fraction of [125I]biphalin was shown to penetrate to the brain (0.051 ± 0.011%, at 20 min). After i.c.v. administration, biphalin antinociception was antagonized by receptor selective doses of β-funaltrexamine (μ antagonist), naloxonazine (μ1 antagonist), ICI 174,864 (δ antagonist) and [D- Ala2,Cys4]deltorphin (δ2 antagonist), but not by [D- Ala2,Leu5,Cys6]enkephalin (δ1 antagonist) or nor-binaltorphimine (κ antagonist), whereas etorphine antinociception was significantly antagonized only by β-funaltrexamine and naloxonazine. Intracerebroventricular biphalin inhibited gastrointestinal propulsion at doses 8-fold higher than those producing i.c.v. antinociception; i.c.v. morphine showed a similar antinociceptive and gastrointestinal propulsion A50. Intraperitoneal biphalin, but not i.p. morphine, showed little, if any, physical dependence, but both biphalin and morphine produced significant physical dependence when equiantinociceptive doses were infused i.c.v. These results demonstrate an unusual profile for biphalin which suggests a potentially novel mechanism which may involve, in part, the putative opioid receptor complex of physically or functionally interacting μ and δ2 opioid receptors. Biphalin may thus represent the first in a series of such compounds which may lead to significant therapeutic advantages.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027379024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027379024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 8389867
AN - SCOPUS:0027379024
SN - 0022-3565
VL - 265
SP - 1446
EP - 1454
JO - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
JF - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
IS - 3
ER -