Animal deception and the content of signals

  • Don Fallis
  • , Peter J. Lewis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In cases of animal mimicry, the receiver of the signal learns the truth that he is either dealing with the real thing or with a mimic. Thus, despite being a prototypical example of animal deception, mimicry does not seem to qualify as deception on the traditional definition, since the receiver is not actually misled. We offer a new account of propositional content in sender-receiver games that explains how the receiver is misled (and deceived) by mimicry. We show that previous accounts of deception, and of propositional content, give incorrect results about whether certain signals are deceptive.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)114-124
    Number of pages11
    JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science
    Volume87
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2021

    Keywords

    • Animal signaling
    • Deception
    • Game theory
    • Mimicry
    • Propositional content
    • Withholding information

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • History
    • History and Philosophy of Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Animal deception and the content of signals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this