TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of mutant HLA-A2 molecules
T2 - Differential effects on peptide binding and CTL recognition
AU - Tussey, Lynda G.
AU - Matsui, Masanori
AU - Rowland-Jones, Sarah
AU - Warburton, Robert
AU - Frelinger, Jeffrey A.
AU - McMichael, Andrew
PY - 1994/2/1
Y1 - 1994/2/1
N2 - Previous studies have identified several residues lining the groove of the HLA-A2.1 molecule that are critical for Ag presentation. However, it is not clear whether these residues are critical for binding of the peptide epitope per se or for determining the appropriate conformation of bound peptide. To distinguish between these possibilities, mutations at eight of these residues have been tested for their effects on the ability of the molecule to bind and present two known peptide epitopes-one derived from the influenza A matrix protein, the other from HIV pol. With only one exception, the mutations were found to affect the binding of the two peptides similarly. Most of the mutations resulted in intermediate deleterious effects on binding, with the B pocket mutant F9Y having the most dramatic negative effect on binding for both peptides. Two of the mutations significantly enhanced binding of both peptides and a peptide-specific effect on binding was seen with the substitution, Y99H, which enhanced binding of the matrix peptide yet diminished binding of the pol peptide. In contrast to the effects on binding, the effects of the mutations on presentation differed considerably for the two peptides. The most striking difference was seen with two α2 α helix mutants that are fully recognized by pol peptide-specific CTL but not recognized by matrix peptide-specific CTL even though levels of binding were comparably diminished for the two peptides. These results suggest that some interactions, although not critical for binding per se, are critical for functional binding and the importance of these interactions differs among peptide epitopes.
AB - Previous studies have identified several residues lining the groove of the HLA-A2.1 molecule that are critical for Ag presentation. However, it is not clear whether these residues are critical for binding of the peptide epitope per se or for determining the appropriate conformation of bound peptide. To distinguish between these possibilities, mutations at eight of these residues have been tested for their effects on the ability of the molecule to bind and present two known peptide epitopes-one derived from the influenza A matrix protein, the other from HIV pol. With only one exception, the mutations were found to affect the binding of the two peptides similarly. Most of the mutations resulted in intermediate deleterious effects on binding, with the B pocket mutant F9Y having the most dramatic negative effect on binding for both peptides. Two of the mutations significantly enhanced binding of both peptides and a peptide-specific effect on binding was seen with the substitution, Y99H, which enhanced binding of the matrix peptide yet diminished binding of the pol peptide. In contrast to the effects on binding, the effects of the mutations on presentation differed considerably for the two peptides. The most striking difference was seen with two α2 α helix mutants that are fully recognized by pol peptide-specific CTL but not recognized by matrix peptide-specific CTL even though levels of binding were comparably diminished for the two peptides. These results suggest that some interactions, although not critical for binding per se, are critical for functional binding and the importance of these interactions differs among peptide epitopes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028219803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028219803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 8301126
AN - SCOPUS:0028219803
SN - 0022-1767
VL - 152
SP - 1213
EP - 1221
JO - Journal of Immunology
JF - Journal of Immunology
IS - 3
ER -