TY - JOUR
T1 - An improved isotopic method for partitioning net ecosystem-atmosphere CO2 exchange
AU - Wehr, R.
AU - Saleska, S. R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy , Office of Science, Terrestrial Ecosystem Science (TES) Program (Award #DE-SC0006741 ). The Harvard Forest Environmental Measurements Site infrastructure is a component of the Harvard Forest Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) site, supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), and is additionally supported by the DOE TES program.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V..
PY - 2015/12/15
Y1 - 2015/12/15
N2 - Stable carbon isotopes can be used to partition the net ecosystem-atmosphere exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide (CO2) into its photosynthetic and respiratory components, but the method has not been generally adopted due to instrumental and theoretical limitations. Here, motivated by recently improved instrumentation, we extend the theory of isotopic flux partitioning to include photorespiration, foliar daytime 'dark' respiration, and other refinements, arriving at a general yet practical formulation from which all previous formulations can be derived as simplifying approximations. We use a full growing season of isotopic eddy covariance flux data from a temperate deciduous forest to demonstrate the method, quantify its uncertainties, and determine biases associated with previously published formulations. We find that when δ13C of CO2 is acquired with high precision (0.02‰ RMSE for 100s integration times), the statistical uncertainty in the partitioned fluxes is comparable to that in NEE itself-i.e., as good as practicably possible. Assessable systematic uncertainty is ±17% of gross ecosystem production (GEP), due mostly to uncertainty in the isotopic fractionation by carboxylation. Additional, currently unquantifiable systematic uncertainty is associated with treating the canopy as a single "big leaf". Both sources of systematic uncertainty could be greatly reduced by feasible supporting leaf-level measurements. Our extended theory corrects systematic biases in previous isotopic approaches, including overestimation (by 13%) of GEP due to the omission of photorespiration. The partitioning determines the isotopic signature of photosynthesis, which we find to vary seasonally between -24 and -28‰ such that the isotopic disequilibrium between ecosystem carbon input and output remains stable at approximately -0.5‰ through most of the growing season. The key advantage of isotopic partitioning over standard, regression-based partitioning is that it enables controls on the ecosystem-scale photosynthetic and respiratory fluxes to emerge from observations, without having to assume functional relations to environmental drivers a priori. As an example, we show how isotopic partitioning reveals certain large variations in daytime NEE to be caused by shifts in the flux tower sampling footprint between regions of high and low respiratory flux-a finding unobtainable by standard partitioning. For this reason, isotopic partitioning can be more precise than standard partitioning for quantifying environmental controls on NEE.
AB - Stable carbon isotopes can be used to partition the net ecosystem-atmosphere exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide (CO2) into its photosynthetic and respiratory components, but the method has not been generally adopted due to instrumental and theoretical limitations. Here, motivated by recently improved instrumentation, we extend the theory of isotopic flux partitioning to include photorespiration, foliar daytime 'dark' respiration, and other refinements, arriving at a general yet practical formulation from which all previous formulations can be derived as simplifying approximations. We use a full growing season of isotopic eddy covariance flux data from a temperate deciduous forest to demonstrate the method, quantify its uncertainties, and determine biases associated with previously published formulations. We find that when δ13C of CO2 is acquired with high precision (0.02‰ RMSE for 100s integration times), the statistical uncertainty in the partitioned fluxes is comparable to that in NEE itself-i.e., as good as practicably possible. Assessable systematic uncertainty is ±17% of gross ecosystem production (GEP), due mostly to uncertainty in the isotopic fractionation by carboxylation. Additional, currently unquantifiable systematic uncertainty is associated with treating the canopy as a single "big leaf". Both sources of systematic uncertainty could be greatly reduced by feasible supporting leaf-level measurements. Our extended theory corrects systematic biases in previous isotopic approaches, including overestimation (by 13%) of GEP due to the omission of photorespiration. The partitioning determines the isotopic signature of photosynthesis, which we find to vary seasonally between -24 and -28‰ such that the isotopic disequilibrium between ecosystem carbon input and output remains stable at approximately -0.5‰ through most of the growing season. The key advantage of isotopic partitioning over standard, regression-based partitioning is that it enables controls on the ecosystem-scale photosynthetic and respiratory fluxes to emerge from observations, without having to assume functional relations to environmental drivers a priori. As an example, we show how isotopic partitioning reveals certain large variations in daytime NEE to be caused by shifts in the flux tower sampling footprint between regions of high and low respiratory flux-a finding unobtainable by standard partitioning. For this reason, isotopic partitioning can be more precise than standard partitioning for quantifying environmental controls on NEE.
KW - Carbon dioxide
KW - Eddy covariance
KW - Forest
KW - Isotope
KW - Net ecosystem exchange
KW - Partitioning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943606841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943606841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.009
DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84943606841
SN - 0168-1923
VL - 214-215
SP - 515
EP - 531
JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
ER -