Abstract
Discretionary controls are controls that can be applied at the ex post discretion of the superior rather than being supported by pre-committed enforceable contracts. This study examines employees’ effort levels when a discretionary control is endogenously present (chosen by the superior) relative to when it is exogenously present (assigned by the experimenters). Results from our gift-exchange experiment regarding superiors’ choice of a discretionary control run counter to prior research on superiors’ choice to use pre-committed controls in two important ways. First, we find employee effort is unaffected by the superior’s choice of a discretionary control relative to when it is exogenous. That is, the intentional choice of a discretionary control does not seem to be resented by the employee. Second, we find employee effort is lower when superiors choose not to have a discretionary control present relative to when it is exogenously unavailable. That is, we not only find no reward to forgoing a discretionary control, but rather a cost to not choosing a discretionary control. In sum, our results support the prevalence of discretionary controls in practice.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 77-103 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | European Accounting Review |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Discretionary Controls
- Endogenous Controls
- Gift-Exchange
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Accounting
- Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
- Automotive Engineering
- Aerospace Engineering
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)