TY - JOUR
T1 - Alzheimer's disease medication and risk of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization
T2 - A retrospective cohort study
AU - Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
AU - Patanwala, Asad E.
AU - Lo-Ciganic, Wei Hsuan
AU - Malone, Daniel C.
AU - Lee, Jeannie K.
AU - Knapp, Shannon M.
AU - Warholak, Terri
AU - Burke, William J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Introduction: Identifying Alzheimer's disease (AD) pharmacologic treatment options that effectively reduce the risk of mortality and hospitalization in real-world settings is critical. Methods: We compared donepezil, galantamine, memantine, oral rivastigmine, and transdermal rivastigmine with regard to all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization risk among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with AD (aged ≥ 65 years) using a retrospective cohort study design. Our primary analysis was based on intention to treat (ITT), but we also present as-treated analysis. Results: In our final study sample (N = 21,558), significant difference in survival among index AD medication groups were observed with donepezil being associated with better survival than memantine, and oral and transdermal forms of rivastigmine for both ITT and as-treated analysis. Difference in hazards of all-cause hospitalization among index AD medication groups was observed in ITT analysis but not in as-treated analysis. Discussion: Significant differences exist in terms of mortality and hospitalization risk with different AD medication initiation in real-world setting.
AB - Introduction: Identifying Alzheimer's disease (AD) pharmacologic treatment options that effectively reduce the risk of mortality and hospitalization in real-world settings is critical. Methods: We compared donepezil, galantamine, memantine, oral rivastigmine, and transdermal rivastigmine with regard to all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization risk among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with AD (aged ≥ 65 years) using a retrospective cohort study design. Our primary analysis was based on intention to treat (ITT), but we also present as-treated analysis. Results: In our final study sample (N = 21,558), significant difference in survival among index AD medication groups were observed with donepezil being associated with better survival than memantine, and oral and transdermal forms of rivastigmine for both ITT and as-treated analysis. Difference in hazards of all-cause hospitalization among index AD medication groups was observed in ITT analysis but not in as-treated analysis. Discussion: Significant differences exist in terms of mortality and hospitalization risk with different AD medication initiation in real-world setting.
KW - All-cause hospitalization
KW - All-cause mortality
KW - Alzheimer's disease medications
KW - Inverse probability of treatment weighting
KW - Safety
KW - Survival analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068571466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068571466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.trci.2019.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.trci.2019.05.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85068571466
SN - 2352-8737
VL - 5
SP - 294
EP - 302
JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions
JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions
ER -