Alter-geopolitics and the feminist challenge to the securitization of climate policy

Geoffrey Alan Boyce, Sarah Launius, Jill Williams, Todd Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


In the United States and beyond the challenges of global climate change are increasingly being governed via the militarization of nation-state borders rather than, or in addition to, the mitigation of carbon emissions and collective strategies for climate adaptation. In this article we apply the concept of “geopopulationism,” introduced by Bhatia et al. (this issue), to think through the zero-sum Manichaean logics of traditional geopolitical calculation and the ways these become applied to climate governance via the securitization of climate change-related migration. In order to disrupt this securitization of climate policy, we draw on the insights of feminist geopolitics and what Koopman calls “alter-geopolitics” to consider how contemporary grassroots movements like the Sanctuary movement and #BlackLivesMatter have made connections between political, economic and environmental vulnerabilities while developing relationships of solidarity and care that broaden, disseminate, distribute and regenerate security as an expansive and inclusive project. We conclude by considering ways that scholars can continue to ally ourselves with and contribute to these grassroots efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-411
Number of pages18
JournalGender, Place and Culture
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 3 2020


  • Climate change
  • alter-geopolitics
  • feminist geopolitics
  • geopopulationism
  • migration
  • security
  • social movements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Demography
  • Cultural Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'Alter-geopolitics and the feminist challenge to the securitization of climate policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this