Airway management and ventilation during CPR

Charles W. Otto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this porcine model of fibrillatory cardiac arrest (Table 1), ventilation during basic life support does not improve 24-hour survival or neurological outcome compared to chest compressions alone when advanced life support is provided within 15 minutes of arrest. Bystander CPR can save lives, but is usually not offered, at least in part, because of reluctance to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation. If chest compressions alone are similarly effective and more acceptable compared to chest compressions and mouth-to-mouth ventilation, the simpler technique may result in more lives saved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-54
Number of pages3
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Supplement
Volume41
Issue number111
StatePublished - 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Airway management and ventilation during CPR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this