Affective Consistency and Sorting

Nicholas T. Davis, Samara Klar, Christopher R. Weber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Objective: Sorting is often portrayed as a mechanistic response to elite polarization: individuals recognize salient differences between the parties and match their preferences accordingly. Much less is known, however, about the psychological and motivational processes that contribute to it. In particular, how might affective reactions to elites shape convergence among political preferences?. Method: To explore the relationship between the consistency of self-reported affect and sorting, we analyze cross-sectional and panel data from the American National Election Studies. Results: On balance, we find that negative emotions directed toward the opposing party candidate and positive emotions toward one's own party candidate are associated with an increase in the alignment of ideological and partisan preferences. Conclusion: These findings illustrate how affect contributes to consistency in mass opinion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2477-2494
Number of pages18
JournalSocial Science Quarterly
Issue number6
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'Affective Consistency and Sorting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this