TY - JOUR
T1 - Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment
AU - Liu, Jingyu
AU - Piegorsch, Walter W.
AU - Schissler, A. Grant
AU - McCaster, Rachel R.
AU - Cutter, Susan L.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was supported in part by #ES027394 from the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Thanks are due to Dr Stephan R. Sain for his seminal suggestions on developing non-spatial measures of autocorrelation, to Dr John Hughes for discussions on the centered autologistic model, and to an anonymous referee for quite helpful suggestions on how to improve the manuscript. This material represents a portion of the first author's PhD dissertation from the University of Arizona Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We develop and study a quantitative, interdisciplinary strategy for conducting statistical risk analyses within the ‘benchmark risk’ paradigm of contemporary risk assessment when potential autocorrelation exists among sample units. We use the methodology to explore information on vulnerability to natural hazards across 3108 counties in the conterminous 48 US states, applying a place-based resilience index to an existing knowledgebase of hazardous incidents and related human casualties. An extension of a centered autologistic regression model is applied to relate local, county-level vulnerability to hazardous outcomes. Adjustments for autocorrelation embedded in the resiliency information are applied via a novel, non-spatial neighborhood structure. Statistical risk-benchmarking techniques are then incorporated into the modeling framework, wherein levels of high and low vulnerability to hazards are identified.
AB - We develop and study a quantitative, interdisciplinary strategy for conducting statistical risk analyses within the ‘benchmark risk’ paradigm of contemporary risk assessment when potential autocorrelation exists among sample units. We use the methodology to explore information on vulnerability to natural hazards across 3108 counties in the conterminous 48 US states, applying a place-based resilience index to an existing knowledgebase of hazardous incidents and related human casualties. An extension of a centered autologistic regression model is applied to relate local, county-level vulnerability to hazardous outcomes. Adjustments for autocorrelation embedded in the resiliency information are applied via a novel, non-spatial neighborhood structure. Statistical risk-benchmarking techniques are then incorporated into the modeling framework, wherein levels of high and low vulnerability to hazards are identified.
KW - Benchmark dose
KW - centered autologistic model
KW - maximum pseudo-likelihood
KW - natural hazard vulnerability
KW - non-spatial autocorrelation
KW - quantitative risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103651147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103651147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02664763.2021.1904385
DO - 10.1080/02664763.2021.1904385
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85103651147
SN - 0266-4763
VL - 49
SP - 2349
EP - 2369
JO - Journal of Applied Statistics
JF - Journal of Applied Statistics
IS - 9
ER -